Validation and Scoring of the Greek Version of the Strategic and Clinical Quality Indicators in Postoperative Pain Management (SCQIPP) Questionnaire

被引：2

作者：

Sarakatsianou, Chamaidi ^{[1
]}

Baloyiannis, Ioannis ^{[2
]}

Perivoliotis, Konstantinos ^{[2
]}

Kolonia, Konstantina ^{[1
]}

Georgopoulou, Stavroula ^{[1
]}

Tzovaras, George ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Hosp Larissa, Dept Anesthesiol, Viopolis 41110, Larissa, Greece

[2] Univ Hosp Larissa, Dept Surg, Mezourlo, Larissa, Greece

来源：

JOURNAL OF PERIANESTHESIA NURSING | 2022年 / 37卷 / 06期

关键词：

questionnaire; postoperative; pain; management; surgery; PATIENT SATISFACTION; SURGERY; CARE; NURSES;

D O I：

10.1016/j.jopan.2022.03.005

中图分类号：

R47 [护理学];

学科分类号：

1011 ;

摘要：

Purpose: The aim of this study was to validate the Greek version of the Strategic and Clinical Quality Indicators in Postoperative Pain Management (SCQIPP) questionnaire. Design: The study was designed as a prospective questionnaire survey. Methods: Overall, 210 elective surgical patients were included. SCQIPP consisted of 14 items that were scored on a five point scale. After the translation and linguistic adjustments, the tool was distributed to the surgical wards. Internal consistency reliability was assessed by Cronbach's alpha. The tool construct was generated by a principal axis factoring model with promax rotation. Findings: Base Cronbach's alpha was 0.814. Due to low inter-item and item-total correlations and the increase of Cronbach's alpha (0.834) when item two was deleted, 13 items were included in the current tool version. Factor analysis identified three district subscales: nursing care, pain management, and support. Subscale and convergent validity were confirmed. The mean score of the validated tool was 55.2 (Range: 44-63). A low level of care was highlighted in most items. Conclusions: The Greek version of the SCQIPP questionnaire is a valid and efficient tool for the evaluation of the quality of care of postoperative pain management. (c) 2022 American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：918 / 924

页数：7

共 36 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 1979, Pain, V6, P249

[2] Postoperative Analgesic THerapy Observational Survey (PATHOS): A practice pattern study in 7 central/southern European countries [J].

Benhamou, Dan ;

Berti, Marco ;

Brodner, Gerhard ;

De Andres, Jose ;

Draisci, Gaetano ;

Moreno-Azcoita, Mariano ;

Neugebauer, Edmund A. M. ;

Schwenk, Wolfgang ;

Torres, Luis Miguel ;

Viel, Eric .

PAIN, 2008, 136 (1-2) :134-141

[3]

Beverly Anair, 2017, Anesthesiol Clin, V35, pe115, DOI [10.1016/j.anclin.2017.01.018, 10.1016/j.anclin.2017.01.018]

[4]

Chambers R. L., 2003, ANAL SURVEY DATA

[5] A Scoping Review of Pain Management Education Programs (PMEPs): Do They Prepare Nurses to Deal with Patients' Postoperative Pain? [J].

Chatchumni, Manaporn ;

Eriksson, Henrik ;

Mazaheri, Monir .

PAIN RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 2020, 2020

[6] Postoperative pain assessment tools in day surgery: literature review [J].

Coll, AM ;

Ameen, JRM ;

Mead, D .

JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2004, 46 (02) :124-133

[7] Incidence, patient satisfaction, and perceptions of post-surgical pain: results from a US national survey [J].

Gan, Tong J. ;

Habib, Ashraf S. ;

Miller, Timothy E. ;

White, William ;

Apfelbaum, Jeffrey L. .

CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2014, 30 (01) :149-160

[8] Pain Intensity on the First Day after Surgery A Prospective Cohort Study Comparing 179 Surgical Procedures [J].

Gerbershagen, Hans J. ;

Aduckathil, Sanjay ;

van Wijck, Albert J. M. ;

Peelen, Linda M. ;

Kalkman, Cor J. ;

Meissner, Winfried .

ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2013, 118 (04) :934-944

[9]

Gunningberg Lena, 2007, J Nurs Manag, V15, P756, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2934.2006.00753.x

[10]

Gupta A, 2010, J ADV PHARM TECHNOL, V1, P97

← 1 2 3 4 →