Modified dixon-based renal dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI facilitates automated registration and perfusion analysis

被引:9
|
作者
de Boer, Anneloes [1 ]
Leiner, Tim [1 ]
Vink, Eva E. [1 ]
Blankestijn, Peter J. [1 ]
van den Berg, Cornelis A. T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Med Ctr, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
DCE MRI; kidney; registration; automated postprocessing; Dixon; perfusion contrast agent; GLOMERULAR-FILTRATION-RATE; SINGLE-KIDNEY-FUNCTION; DCE-MRI; CELL CARCINOMA; 2-COMPARTMENT MODEL; IMAGE REGISTRATION; MUTUAL-INFORMATION; PARAMETERS; FRAMEWORK; QUANTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1002/mrm.26999
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeRenal dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI provides information on renal perfusion and filtration. However, clinical implementation is hampered by challenges in postprocessing as a result of misalignment of the kidneys due to respiration. We propose to perform automated image registration using the fat-only images derived from a modified Dixon reconstruction of a dual-echo acquisition because these provide consistent contrast over the dynamic series. MethodsDCE data of 10 hypertensive patients was used. Dual-echo images were acquired at 1.5T with temporal resolution of 3.9 s during contrast agent injection. Dixon fat, water, and in-phase and opposed-phase (OP) images were reconstructed. Postprocessing was automated. Registration was performed both to fat images and OP images for comparison. Perfusion and filtration values were extracted from a two-compartment model fit. ResultsAutomatic registration to fat images performed better than automatic registration to OP images with visible contrast enhancement. Median vertical misalignment of the kidneys was 14mm prior to registration, compared to 3mm and 5mm with registration to fat images and OP images, respectively (P=0.03). Mean perfusion values and MR-based glomerular filtration rates (GFR) were 23364mL/100mL/min and 60 +/- 36mL/minute, respectively, based on fat-registered images. MR-based GFR correlated with creatinine-based GFR (P=0.04) for fat-registered images. For unregistered and OP-registered images, this correlation was not significant. ConclusionAbsence of contrast changes on Dixon fat images improves registration in renal DCE MRI and enables automated postprocessing, resulting in a more accurate estimation of GFR. Magn Reson Med 80:66-76, 2018. (c) 2017 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 76
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quantitative Analysis of Vertebral Bone Marrow Perfusion Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI: Initial Results in Osteoporotic Patients With Acute Vertebral Fracture
    Biffar, Andreas
    Schmidt, Gerwin P.
    Sourbron, Steven
    D'Anastasi, Melvin
    Dietrich, Olaf
    Notohamiprodjo, Mike
    Reiser, Maximilian F.
    Baur-Melnyk, Andrea
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2011, 33 (03) : 676 - 683
  • [22] High temporal resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using compressed sensing-combined sequence in quantitative renal perfusion measurement
    Chen, Bin
    Zhao, Kai
    Li, Bo
    Cai, Wenchao
    Wang, Xiaoying
    Zhang, Jue
    Fang, Jing
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 33 (08) : 962 - 969
  • [23] Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI perfusion quantification in hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of gadoxetate disodium and gadobenate dimeglumine
    Stocker, Daniel
    Hectors, Stefanie
    Bane, Octavia
    Vietti-Violi, Naik
    Said, Daniela
    Kennedy, Paul
    Cuevas, Jordan
    Cunha, Guilherme M.
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    Fowler, Kathryn J.
    Lewis, Sara
    Taouli, Bachir
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (12) : 9306 - 9315
  • [24] Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Imaging in MRI and CT: Theoretical Models and Current Implementation
    Pelgrim, G. J.
    Handayani, A.
    Dijkstra, H.
    Prakken, N. H. J.
    Slart, R. H. J. A.
    Oudkerk, M.
    Van Ooijen, P. M. A.
    Vliegenthart, R.
    Sijens, P. E.
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 2016
  • [25] Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Measuring Pancreatic Perfusion in Acute Pancreatitis: A Preliminary Study
    Hu, Ran
    Yang, Hua
    Chen, Yong
    Zhou, Ting
    Zhang, Ju
    Chen, Tian Wu
    Zhang, Xiao Ming
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2019, 26 (12) : 1641 - 1649
  • [26] Fully automated registration and warping of contrast-enhanced first-pass perfusion images
    Gallippi, CM
    Kramer, CM
    Hu, YL
    Vido, DA
    Reichek, N
    Rogers, WJ
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2002, 4 (04) : 459 - 469
  • [27] Tracer kinetic model-driven registration for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI time-series data
    Buonaccorsi, Giovanni A.
    O'Connor, James P. B.
    Caunce, Angela
    Roberts, Caleb
    Cheung, Sue
    Watson, Yvonne
    Davies, Karen
    Hope, Lynn
    Jackson, Alan
    Jayson, Gordon C.
    Parker, Geoffrey J. M.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2007, 58 (05) : 1010 - 1019
  • [28] Cross-Visit Tumor Sub-segmentation and Registration with Outlier Rejection for Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Time Series Data
    Buonaccorsi, G. A.
    Rose, C. J.
    O'Connor, J. P. B.
    Roberts, C.
    Watson, Y.
    Jackson, A.
    Jayson, G. C.
    Parker, G. J. M.
    MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER-ASSISTED INTERVENTION - MICCAI 2010, PT III, 2010, 6363 : 121 - +
  • [29] Development and evaluation of TWIST Dixon for dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI with improved acquisition efficiency and fat suppression
    Le, Yuan
    Kroeker, Randall
    Kipfer, Hal D.
    Lin, Chen
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2012, 36 (02) : 483 - 491
  • [30] Dynamic fractal signature dissimilarity analysis for therapeutic response assessment using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI
    Wang, Chunhao
    Subashi, Ergys
    Yin, Fang-Fang
    Chang, Zheng
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (03) : 1335 - 1347