Modified dixon-based renal dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI facilitates automated registration and perfusion analysis

被引:9
|
作者
de Boer, Anneloes [1 ]
Leiner, Tim [1 ]
Vink, Eva E. [1 ]
Blankestijn, Peter J. [1 ]
van den Berg, Cornelis A. T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Med Ctr, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
DCE MRI; kidney; registration; automated postprocessing; Dixon; perfusion contrast agent; GLOMERULAR-FILTRATION-RATE; SINGLE-KIDNEY-FUNCTION; DCE-MRI; CELL CARCINOMA; 2-COMPARTMENT MODEL; IMAGE REGISTRATION; MUTUAL-INFORMATION; PARAMETERS; FRAMEWORK; QUANTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1002/mrm.26999
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PurposeRenal dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI provides information on renal perfusion and filtration. However, clinical implementation is hampered by challenges in postprocessing as a result of misalignment of the kidneys due to respiration. We propose to perform automated image registration using the fat-only images derived from a modified Dixon reconstruction of a dual-echo acquisition because these provide consistent contrast over the dynamic series. MethodsDCE data of 10 hypertensive patients was used. Dual-echo images were acquired at 1.5T with temporal resolution of 3.9 s during contrast agent injection. Dixon fat, water, and in-phase and opposed-phase (OP) images were reconstructed. Postprocessing was automated. Registration was performed both to fat images and OP images for comparison. Perfusion and filtration values were extracted from a two-compartment model fit. ResultsAutomatic registration to fat images performed better than automatic registration to OP images with visible contrast enhancement. Median vertical misalignment of the kidneys was 14mm prior to registration, compared to 3mm and 5mm with registration to fat images and OP images, respectively (P=0.03). Mean perfusion values and MR-based glomerular filtration rates (GFR) were 23364mL/100mL/min and 60 +/- 36mL/minute, respectively, based on fat-registered images. MR-based GFR correlated with creatinine-based GFR (P=0.04) for fat-registered images. For unregistered and OP-registered images, this correlation was not significant. ConclusionAbsence of contrast changes on Dixon fat images improves registration in renal DCE MRI and enables automated postprocessing, resulting in a more accurate estimation of GFR. Magn Reson Med 80:66-76, 2018. (c) 2017 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 76
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Shape-based motion correction in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for quantitative assessment of renal function
    Liu, Wenyang
    Sung, Kyunghyun
    Ruan, Dan
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (12)
  • [2] Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI measurement of renal function in healthy participants
    Eikefjord, Eli
    Andersen, Erling
    Hodneland, Erlend
    Hanson, Erik A.
    Sourbron, Steven
    Svarstad, Einar
    Lundervold, Arvid
    Rorvik, Jarle T.
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2017, 58 (06) : 748 - 757
  • [3] A variational approach to image registration in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the human kidney
    Merrem, Andreas D.
    Zoellner, Frank G.
    Reich, Marcel
    Lundervold, Arvid
    Rorvik, Jarle
    Schad, Lothar R.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2013, 31 (05) : 771 - 777
  • [4] Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI-Based Early Detection of Acute Renal Transplant Rejection
    Khalifa, Fahmi
    Beache, Garth M.
    Abou El-Ghar, Mohamed
    El-Diasty, Tarek
    Gimel'farb, Georgy
    Kong, Maiying
    El-Baz, Ayman
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2013, 32 (10) : 1910 - 1927
  • [5] Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the patellar bone: How to quantify perfusion
    Poot, Dirk H. J.
    van der Heijden, Rianne A.
    van Middelkoop, Marienke
    Oei, Edwin H. G.
    Klein, Stefan
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2018, 47 (03) : 848 - 858
  • [6] Measuring Perfusion and Permeability in Renal Cell Carcinoma With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI: A Pilot Study
    Notohamiprodjo, Mike
    Sourbron, Steven
    Staehler, Michael
    Michaely, Henrik J.
    Attenberger, Ulrike I.
    Schmidt, Gerwin R.
    Boehm, Holger
    Horng, Annie
    Glaser, Christian
    Stief, Christian
    Reiser, Maximilian F.
    Herrmann, Karin A.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2010, 31 (02) : 490 - 501
  • [7] Evaluating the Accuracy and Impact of Registration in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI
    Hill, Andrew
    Mehnert, Andrew
    Crozier, Stuart
    McMahon, Kerry
    CONCEPTS IN MAGNETIC RESONANCE PART B-MAGNETIC RESONANCE ENGINEERING, 2009, 35B (02) : 106 - 120
  • [8] Measurement of Placental Perfusion by Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI at 4.7 T
    Alison, Marianne
    Quibel, Thibault
    Balvay, Daniel
    Autret, Gwennhael
    Bourillon, Camille
    Chalouhi, Gihad E.
    Deloison, Benjamin
    Salomon, Laurent J.
    Cuenod, Charles Andre
    Clement, Olivier
    Siauve, Nathalie
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2013, 48 (07) : 535 - 542
  • [9] Feasibility of CAIPIRINHA-Dixon-TWIST-VIBE for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the prostate
    Othman, Ahmed E.
    Martirosian, Petros
    Schraml, Christina
    Taron, Jana
    Weiss, Jakob
    Bier, Georg
    Schwentner, Christian
    Nickel, Dominik
    Bamberg, Fabian
    Kramer, Ulrich
    Nikolaou, Konstantin
    Notohamiprodjo, Mike
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 84 (11) : 2110 - 2116
  • [10] Reproducibility and Optimal Arterial Input Function Selection in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MRI in the Healthy Brain
    Cramer, Stig P.
    Larsson, Henrik B. W.
    Knudsen, Maria H.
    Simonsen, Helle J.
    Vestergaard, Mark B.
    Lindberg, Ulrich
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2023, 57 (04) : 1229 - 1240