Budget Impact Analysis of Switching to Digital Mammography in a Population-Based Breast Cancer Screening Program: A Discrete Event Simulation Model

被引:20
|
作者
Comas, Merce [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Arrospide, Arantzazu [3 ,4 ]
Mar, Javier [3 ,4 ]
Sala, Maria [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Vilaprinyo, Ester [3 ,5 ]
Hernandez, Cristina [1 ,2 ]
Cots, Francesc [2 ,3 ,6 ]
Martinez, Juan [7 ]
Castells, Xavier [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp del Mar, Epidemiol & Evaluat Dept, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Hosp del Mar Med Res Inst IMIM, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Red Invest Serv Salud Enfermedades Cron REDISSEC, Valencia, Spain
[4] Hosp Alto Deba, Gipuzkoa Oeste Res Unit, Arrasate Mondragon, Spain
[5] Univ Lleida, Biomed Res Inst Lleida IRBLLEIDA, Basic Med Sci Dept, Lleida, Spain
[6] Hosp del Mar, Management Control Dept, Barcelona, Spain
[7] Hosp del Mar, Dept Radiol, Barcelona, Spain
来源
PLOS ONE | 2014年 / 9卷 / 05期
关键词
FILM MAMMOGRAPHY; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; IMPLEMENTATION; TRANSITION; REDUCTION; INTERVAL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0097459
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the budgetary impact of switching from screen-film mammography to full-field digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening program. Methods: A discrete-event simulation model was built to reproduce the breast cancer screening process (biennial mammographic screening of women aged 50 to 69 years) combined with the natural history of breast cancer. The simulation started with 100,000 women and, during a 20-year simulation horizon, new women were dynamically entered according to the aging of the Spanish population. Data on screening were obtained from Spanish breast cancer screening programs. Data on the natural history of breast cancer were based on US data adapted to our population. A budget impact analysis comparing digital with screen-film screening mammography was performed in a sample of 2,000 simulation runs. A sensitivity analysis was performed for crucial screening-related parameters. Distinct scenarios for recall and detection rates were compared. Results: Statistically significant savings were found for overall costs, treatment costs and the costs of additional tests in the long term. The overall cost saving was 1,115,857(sic) (95%CI from 932,147 to 1,299,567) in the 10th year and 2,866,124(sic) (95% CI from 2,492,610 to 3,239,638) in the 20th year, representing 4.5% and 8.1% of the overall cost associated with screen-film mammography. The sensitivity analysis showed net savings in the long term. Conclusions: Switching to digital mammography in a population-based breast cancer screening program saves long-term budget expense, in addition to providing technical advantages. Our results were consistent across distinct scenarios representing the different results obtained in European breast cancer screening programs.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Use of Text-Message Reminders to Improve Participation in a Population-Based Breast Cancer Screening Program
    C. Vidal
    M. Garcia
    L. Benito
    N. Milà
    G. Binefa
    V. Moreno
    Journal of Medical Systems, 2014, 38
  • [32] Cumulative Advanced Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model Developed in a Screening Mammography Population
    Kerlikowske, Karla
    Chen, Shuai
    Golmakani, Marzieh K.
    Sprague, Brian L.
    Tice, Jeffrey A.
    Tosteson, Anna N. A.
    Rauscher, Garth H.
    Henderson, Louise M.
    Buist, Diana S. M.
    Lee, Janie M.
    Gard, Charlotte C.
    Miglioretti, Diana L.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2022, 114 (05): : 676 - 685
  • [33] Use of Text-Message Reminders to Improve Participation in a Population-Based Breast Cancer Screening Program
    Vidal, C.
    Garcia, M.
    Benito, L.
    Mila, N.
    Binefa, G.
    Moreno, V.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 2014, 38 (09)
  • [34] Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening
    McDonald, Elizabeth S.
    Oustimov, Andrew
    Weinstein, Susan P.
    Synnestvedt, Marie B.
    Schnall, Mitchell
    Conant, Emily F.
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2016, 2 (06) : 737 - 743
  • [35] Digital vs screen-film mammography in population-based breast cancer screening: performance indicators and tumour characteristics of screen-detected and interval cancers
    de Munck, Linda
    de Bock, Geertruida H.
    Otter, Renee
    Reiding, Dick
    Broeders, Mireille J. M.
    Willemse, Pax H. B.
    Siesling, Sabine
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 115 (05) : 517 - 524
  • [36] Evaluation of a mammography screening program within the population-based Vorarlberg Health Monitoring & Prevention Program (VHM&PP)
    Nagel, Gabriele
    Oberaigner, Willi
    Peter, Raphael S.
    Ulmer, Hanno
    Concin, Hans
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 39 (06) : 812 - 818
  • [37] Community-Based Breast Cancer Screening Using Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Digital Mammography: Comparison of Screening Performance and Tumor Characteristics
    Regen-Tuero, Helaina C.
    Ram, Shruthi
    Gass, Jennifer S.
    Lourenco, Ana P.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2022, 218 (02) : 249 - 256
  • [38] Performance indicators evaluation of the population-based breast cancer screening programme in Northern Portugal using the European Guidelines
    Bento, Maria Jose
    Goncalves, Guilherme
    Aguiar, Ana
    Castro, Clara
    Veloso, Vitor
    Rodrigues, Vitor
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 39 (05) : 783 - 789
  • [39] Population-based mammography screening below age 50: balancing radiation-induced vs prevented breast cancer deaths
    de Gelder, R.
    Draisma, G.
    Heijnsdijk, E. A. M.
    de Koning, H. J.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2011, 104 (07) : 1214 - 1220
  • [40] Impact of Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Film-Screen Mammography in Population Screening: A Meta-Analysis
    Farber, Rachel
    Houssami, Nehmat
    Wortley, Sally
    Jacklyn, Gemma
    Marinovich, Michael L.
    McGeechan, Kevin
    Barratt, Alexandra
    Bell, Katy
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2021, 113 (01): : 16 - 26