Natural ocean carbon cycle sensitivity to parameterizations of the recycling in a climate model

被引:18
|
作者
Romanou, A. [1 ]
Romanski, J. [2 ]
Gregg, W. W. [3 ]
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Ctr Clim Syst Res, New York, NY USA
[3] NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, MD USA
关键词
CO2; FLUX; REMINERALIZATION; PHYTOPLANKTON; TEMPERATURE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.5194/bg-11-1137-2014
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Sensitivities of the oceanic biological pump within the GISS (Goddard Institute for Space Studies) climate modeling system are explored here. Results are presented from twin control simulations of the air-sea CO2 gas exchange using two different ocean models coupled to the same atmosphere. The two ocean models (Russell ocean model and Hybrid Coordinate Ocean Model, HYCOM) use different vertical coordinate systems, and therefore different representations of column physics. Both variants of the GISS climate model are coupled to the same ocean biogeochemistry module (the NASA Ocean Biogeochemistry Model, NOBM), which computes prognostic distributions for biotic and abiotic fields that influence the air-sea flux of CO2 and the deep ocean carbon transport and storage. In particular, the model differences due to remineralization rate changes are compared to differences attributed to physical processes modeled differently in the two ocean models such as ventilation, mixing, eddy stirring and vertical advection. GISSEH(GISSER) is found to underestimate mixed layer depth compared to observations by about 55% (10%) in the Southern Ocean and overestimate it by about 17% (underestimate by 2%) in the northern high latitudes. Everywhere else in the global ocean, the two models underestimate the surface mixing by about 12-34%, which prevents deep nutrients from reaching the surface and promoting primary production there. Consequently, carbon export is reduced because of reduced production at the surface. Furthermore, carbon export is particularly sensitive to remineralization rate changes in the frontal regions of the subtropical gyres and at the Equator and this sensitivity in the model is much higher than the sensitivity to physical processes such as vertical mixing, vertical advection and mesoscale eddy transport. At depth, GISSER, which has a significant warm bias, remineralizes nutrients and carbon faster thereby producing more nutrients and carbon at depth, which eventually resurfaces with the global thermohaline circulation especially in the Southern Ocean. Because of the reduced primary production and carbon export in GISSEH compared to GISSER, the biological pump efficiency, i.e., the ratio of primary production and carbon export at 75 m, is half in the GISSEH of that in GISSER, The Southern Ocean emerges as a key region where the CO2 flux is as sensitive to biological parameterizations as it is to physical parameterizations. The fidelity of ocean mixing in the Southern Ocean compared to observations is shown to be a good indicator of the magnitude of the biological pump efficiency regardless of physical model choice.
引用
收藏
页码:1137 / 1154
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sensitivity of the Global Ocean Carbon Sink to the Ocean Skin in a Climate Model
    Bellenger, Hugo
    Bopp, Laurent
    Ethe, Christian
    Ho, David
    Duvel, Jean Philippe
    Flavoni, Simona
    Guez, Lionel
    Kataoka, Takahito
    Perrot, Xavier
    Parc, Laetitia
    Watanabe, Michio
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2023, 128 (07)
  • [2] Constraining the climate and ocean pH of the early Earth with a geological carbon cycle model
    Krissansen-Totton, Joshua
    Arney, Giada N.
    Catling, David C.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2018, 115 (16) : 4105 - 4110
  • [3] Seasonal variability in the inorganic ocean carbon cycle in the Northwest Pacific evaluated using a biogeochemical and carbon model coupled with an operational ocean model
    Ishizu, Miho
    Miyazawa, Yasumasa
    Tsunoda, Tomohiko
    Guo, Xinyu
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2020, 162 (02) : 877 - 902
  • [4] Sensitivity of the carbon cycle in the Arctic to climate change
    McGuire, A. David
    Anderson, Leif G.
    Christensen, Torben R.
    Dallimore, Scott
    Guo, Laodong
    Hayes, Daniel J.
    Heimann, Martin
    Lorenson, Thomas D.
    Macdonald, Robie W.
    Roulet, Nigel
    ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 2009, 79 (04) : 523 - 555
  • [5] MEDUSA-2.0: an intermediate complexity biogeochemical model of the marine carbon cycle for climate change and ocean acidification studies
    Yool, A.
    Popova, E. E.
    Anderson, T. R.
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 6 (05) : 1767 - 1811
  • [6] Simulating natural carbon sequestration in the Southern Ocean: on uncertainties associated with eddy parameterizations and iron deposition
    Dietze, Heiner
    Getzlaff, Julia
    Loeptien, Ulrike
    BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2017, 14 (06) : 1561 - 1576
  • [7] Including an ocean carbon cycle model into iLOVECLIM (v1.0)
    Bouttes, N.
    Roche, D. M.
    Mariotti, V.
    Bopp, L.
    GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 8 (05) : 1563 - 1576
  • [8] Transient Climate Sensitivity Depends on Base Climate Ocean Circulation
    He, Jie
    Winton, Michael
    Vecchi, Gabriel
    Jia, Liwei
    Rugenstein, Maria
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2017, 30 (04) : 1493 - 1504
  • [9] Adjustment of the natural ocean carbon cycle to negative emission rates
    Vichi, M.
    Navarra, A.
    Fogli, P. G.
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2013, 118 (01) : 105 - 118
  • [10] Imminent ocean acidification in the Arctic projected with the NCAR global coupled carbon cycle-climate model
    Steinacher, M.
    Joos, F.
    Froelicher, T. L.
    Plattner, G. -K.
    Doney, S. C.
    BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2009, 6 (04) : 515 - 533