Effect of hoof angle on joint contact area in the equine metacarpophalangeal joint following simulated impact loading ex vivo

被引:2
|
作者
McCarty, C. A. [1 ]
Thomason, J. J. [1 ]
Gordon, K. [2 ]
Hurtig, M. [3 ]
Bignell, W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Guelph, Dept Biomed Sci, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[2] Univ Guelph, Sch Engn, Dept Biomed Engn, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
[3] Univ Guelph, Dept Clin Studies, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
horse; biomechanics; impact; metacarpophalangeal; joint loading; osteoarthritis; SUBCHONDRAL BONE-DENSITY; 3RD METACARPAL; THOROUGHBRED RACEHORSES; CARTILAGE DEGENERATION; MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES; HORSES; TROT; KINEMATICS; PRESSURE; CONDYLES;
D O I
10.1111/evj.12354
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Reasons for performing studyTo add to the existing data on impact loading of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint as a precursor to assessing the potential role of impact in joint disease. ObjectivesTo examine the effect of impact loading on contact areas of the first phalanx (P1) and proximal sesamoids (PS) with the third metacarpal (McIII) under 3 hoof-strike conditions (toe-first, flat, heel-first). Study designRandomised, repeated controlled experiment using cadaver material. MethodsEight cadaver limbs were subjected to randomised, repeated controlled trials where the hoof was struck by a pendulum impact machine (impact velocity 3.55m/s) under 3 strike conditions. Data from pressure sensitive film placed over medial and lateral McIII condyles and lateromedially across the dorsal aspect of McIII were quantified: total areas of P1 and PS contact (cm(2)) at maximum recorded pressure; centroid locations of contact areas relative to the sagittal ridge (cm) and transverse ridge (cm) and dispersion of pixels (cm(4)) for each McIII condyle (medial/lateral). The effect of the strike conditions on each variable were statistically tested using repeated-measures ANOVA ( = 0.05). ResultsContact area between P1 and McIII condyles fell in well-defined areas bounded by the sagittal and transverse ridge, contact areas from PS were smaller and widely dispersed across McIII palmar border. Ratio of contact area of P1 to PS was 2.83 (P<0001). Hoof strike had no significant effect on contact area (P>0.54) ConclusionsContact at impact (primarily from P1 and distally situated on McIII), contrasts with contact areas at midstance from both P1 and PS, symmetrically placed. Under impact, the greatest contact area was on the dorsal aspect of the medial condyle and coincides with the area subjected to the greatest increase in subchondral bone stiffening in joint disease.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 720
页数:6
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Effect of hoof orientation and ballast on acceleration and vibration in the hoof and distal forelimb following simulated impacts ex vivo
    McCarty, C. A.
    Thomason, J. J.
    Gordon, K.
    Burkhart, T.
    Bignell, W.
    EQUINE VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2015, 47 (02) : 223 - 229
  • [2] The effect of two preparation procedures on an equine arena surface in relation to motion of the hoof and metacarpophalangeal joint
    Northrop, Alison J.
    Dagg, Laura-Anne
    Martin, Jaime H.
    Brigden, Charlotte V.
    Owen, Andrew G.
    Blundell, Emma L.
    Peterson, Michael L.
    Hobbs, Sarah J.
    VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2013, 198 : E137 - E142
  • [3] Preliminary data on the effect of osseous anatomy on ex vivo joint mobility in the equine thoracolumbar region
    Jones, K. E.
    EQUINE VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2016, 48 (04) : 502 - 508
  • [4] Effect of Radial Head Implant Shape on Joint Contact Area and Location During Static Loading
    Shannon, Hannah L.
    Deluce, Simon R.
    Lalone, Emily A.
    Willing, Ryan
    King, Graham J. W.
    Johnson, James A.
    JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2015, 40 (04): : 716 - 722
  • [5] The effect of different quadriceps loading patterns on tibiofemoral joint kinematics and patellofemoral contact pressure during simulated partial weight-bearing knee flexion
    Wuenschel, Markus
    Leichtle, Ulf
    Obloh, Christian
    Wuelker, Nikolaus
    Mueller, Otto
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2011, 19 (07) : 1099 - 1106