"I'm Not an Activist!": Animal Rights vs. Animal Welfare in the Purebred Dog Rescue Movement

被引:14
作者
Greenebaum, Jessica [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent Connecticut State Univ, New Britain, CT 06050 USA
关键词
activism; animal rights; animal welfare; rescue workers; volunteers; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1163/106311109X12474622855066
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Purebred dog rescuers are doing their part to reduce the problems of homeless pets and pet overpopulation. The volunteers studied are doing the daily and invisible work of saving dogs. Because of their perception of the animal rights movement, however, they do not consider themselves part of the animal welfare or animal rights movement, nor do they care to be. Dog rescue organizations agree with academics and activist organizations on the cause of the problem of homeless pets and pet overpopulation, but they differ on the theoretical, political, and ideological solutions to the problem. This paper focuses on the disagreements between rescue workers, activists, and academics and asks whether there is a place for rescue workers within the larger animal protection movement.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 304
页数:16
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] Kangaroos vs. Cattle and Sheep: Animal Welfare, Animal Protection, and the Law
    White, Steven
    JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY, 2013, 10 (02) : 273 - 276
  • [2] Animal rescue tourism: digital technology-enhanced approaches to support voluntourist engagement, animal welfare and rights
    Blaer, Madelene
    TOURISM RECREATION RESEARCH, 2024, 49 (03) : 471 - 485
  • [3] Animal Rights vs. Cultural Rights: Exploring the Dog Meat Debate in South Korea from a World Polity Perspective
    Oh, Minjoo
    Jackson, Jeffrey
    JOURNAL OF INTERCULTURAL STUDIES, 2011, 32 (01) : 31 - 56
  • [4] The live animal export industry: a case study of the role played by an Australian blue-collar union in the animal welfare and rights movement
    Jerrard, Marjorie A.
    LABOR HISTORY, 2020, 61 (5-6) : 677 - 691
  • [5] Kangaroos vs. Cattle and Sheep: Animal Welfare, Animal Protection, and the LawComment on “Conservation Through Sustainable Use” by Rob Irvine
    Steven White
    Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 2013, 10 : 273 - 276
  • [6] Intramuscular vs. Intradermic Needle-Free Vaccination in Piglets: Relevance for Animal Welfare Based on an Aversion Learning Test and Vocalizations
    Dalmau, Antoni
    Sanchez-Matamoros, Almudena
    Molina, Jorge M. M.
    Xercavins, Aida
    Varvaro-Porter, Aranzazu
    Munoz, Israel
    Moles, Xenia
    Baulida, Berta
    Fabrega, Emma
    Velarde, Antonio
    Pallisera, Joaquim
    Puigredon, Alba
    Contreras-Jodar, Alexandra
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2021, 8