Social skills training for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children aged 5 to 18 years

Background Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children is associated with hyperactivity and impulsivity, attention problems, and difficulties with social interactions. Pharmacological treatment may alleviate the symptoms of ADHD but this rarely solves difficulties with social interactions. Children with ADHD may benefit from interventions designed to improve their social skills. We examined the benefits and harms of social skills training on social skills, emotional competencies, general behaviour, ADHD symptoms, performance in school of children with ADHD, and adverse events. Objectives To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of social skills training in children and adolescents with ADHD. Search methods In July 2018, we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, 4 other databases and two trials registers. We also searched online conference abstracts, and contacted experts in the field for information about unpublished or ongoing randomised clinical trials. We did not limit our searches by language, year of publication, or type or status of publication, and we sought translation of the relevant sections of non-English language articles. Selection criteria Randomised clinical trials investigating social skills training versus either no intervention or waiting-list control, with or without pharmacological treatment of both comparison groups of children and adolescents with ADHD. Data collection and analysis We conducted the review in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Intervention. We performed the analyses using ReviewManager 5 software and Trial Sequential Analysis. We assessed bias according to domains for systematic errors. We assessed the certainty of the evidence with the GRADE approach. Main results We included 25 randomised clinical trials described in 45 reports. The trials included a total of 2690 participants aged between five and 17 years. In 17 trials, participants were also diagnosed with various comorbidities. The social skills interventions were described as: 1) social skills training, 2) cognitive behavioural therapy, 3) multimodal behavioural/psychosocial therapy, 4) child life and attention skills treatment, 5) life skills training, 6) the "challenging horizon programme", 7) verbal self-instruction, 8) meta-cognitive training, 9) behavioural therapy, 10) behavioural and social skills treatment, and 11) psychosocial treatment. The control interventions were no intervention or waiting list. The duration of the interventions ranged from five weeks to two years. We considered the content of the social skills interventions to be comparable and based on a cognitive-behavioural model. Most of the trials compared child social skills training or parent training combined with medication versus medication alone. Some of the experimental interventions also included teacher consultations. More than half of the trials were at high risk of bias for generation of the allocation sequence and allocation concealment. No trial reported on blinding of participants and personnel. Most of the trials did not report on differences between groups in medication for comorbid disorders. We used all eligible trials in the meta-analyses, but downgraded the certainty of the evidence to low or very low. We found no clinically relevant treatment effect of social skills interventions on the primary outcome measures: teacher-rated social skills at end of treatment standardised mean difference SMD) 0.11, 95% confidence interval CI) 0.00 to 0.22; 11 trials, 1271 participants; I-2 = 0%; P = 0.05); teacher-rated emotional competencies at end of treatment SMD -0.02, 95% CI -0.72 to 0.68; two trials, 129 participants; I-2 = 74%; P = 0.96); or on teacher-rated general behaviour SMD -0.06 negative value better), 95% CI -0.19 to 0.06; eight trials, 1002 participants; I-2 = 0%; P = 0.33). The effect on the primary outcome, teacher-rated social skills at end of treatment, corresponds to a MD of 1.22 points on the social skills rating system SSRS) scale 95% CI 0.09 to 2.36). The minimal clinical relevant difference 10%) on the SSRS is 10.0 points range 0 to 102 points on SSRS). We found evidence in favour of social skills training on teacher-rated core ADHD symptoms at end of treatment for all eligible trials SMD -0.26, 95% CI -0.47 to -0.05; 14 trials, 1379 participants; I-2= 69%; P = 0.02), but the finding is questionable due to lack of support from sensitivity analyses, high risk of bias, lack of clinical significance, high heterogeneity, and low certainty. The studies did not report any serious or non-serious adverse events. Authors' conclusions The review suggests that there is little evidence to support or refute social skills training for children and adolescents with ADHD. We may need more trials that are at low risk of bias and a sufficient number of participants to determine the efficacy of social skills training versus no training for ADHD. The evidence base regarding adolescents is especially weak.