Professionals' Practices and Views regarding Neonatal Postmortem: Can We Improve Consent Rates by Improving Training?

被引:4
作者
Spierson, Hannah [1 ]
Kamupira, Susan [1 ]
Storey, Claire [2 ]
Heazell, Alexander E. P. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Manchester Univ Hosp NHSFT, St Marys Hosp, Neonatal Intens Care Unit, Oxford Rd, Manchester M13 9WL, Lancs, England
[2] Int Stillbirth Alliance, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Univ Manchester, Manchester Acad Hlth Sci Ctr, Fac Biol Med & Hlth, Maternal & Fetal Hlth Res Ctr, Manchester, Lancs, England
[4] Manchester Univ Hosp NHSFT, St Marys Hosp, Dept Obstet, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
Autopsy; Consent; Counselling; Neonatal Death; Post-mortem examination;
D O I
10.1159/000496704
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background: In the UK, rates of neonatal postmortem (PM) are low. Consent for PM is required, and all parents should have the opportunity to discuss whether to have a post-mortem examination of their baby. Objectives: We aimed to explore neonatal healthcare professionals' experiences, knowledge, and views regarding the consent process for postmortem examination after neonatal death. Method: An online survey of neonatal healthcare providers in the UK was conducted. Responses from 103 healthcare professionals were analysed, 84 of whom were doctors. The response rate of the British Association of Perinatal Medicine (BAPM) members was 11.7%. Results: Perceived barriers to PM included cultural and religious practices of parents as well as a lack of rapport between parents and professionals. Of the respondents, 69.4% had observed a PM; these professionals had improved satisfaction with their training and confidence in counselling (p < 0.001 and p < 0.001) but not knowledge of the procedure (p = 0.77). Healthcare professionals reported conservative estimates of the likelihood that a PM would identify significant information regarding the cause of death. Conclusions: Confidence of neonatal staff in counselling could be improved by observing a PM. Training for staff in developing a rapport with parents and addressing emotional distress may also overcome significant barriers to consent for PM. (c) 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 345
页数:5
相关论文
共 4 条
[1]   Value of the perinatal autopsy: Critique [J].
Gordijn, SJ ;
Erwich, JJHM ;
Khong, TY .
PEDIATRIC AND DEVELOPMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2002, 5 (05) :480-488
[2]   A difficult conversation? The views and experiences of parents and professionals on the consent process for perinatal postmortem after stillbirth [J].
Heazell, A. E. P. ;
McLaughlin, M-J ;
Schmidt, E. B. ;
Cox, P. ;
Flenady, V. ;
Khong, T. Y. ;
Downe, S. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2012, 119 (08) :987-997
[3]  
Manktelow BN, 2017, LEICESTER INFANT MOR
[4]   Failing rates of perinatal postmortem examination: are we to blame? [J].
Evans, M. ;
Tooley, J. .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD-FETAL AND NEONATAL EDITION, 2006, 91 (06) :F465-F465