Towards a more transparent and research-based evaluation of design

被引:0
作者
van der Voordt, TJM [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Architecture, NL-2628 CR Delft, Netherlands
来源
RESEARCH BY DESIGN, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS B | 2001年
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The student is on tiptoe with expectation. What will his supervisors say about his final project? The first one is positive about the concept, but criticises heavily the materials used in the facade. The second one starts a discussion on the contrast between the architectural design and its context. The third one raises questions about some technical details, but is not at all clear about his own opinion. No one asks any question about the costs.
引用
收藏
页码:336 / 343
页数:8
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] COLD B, 1990, CULTURE SPACE HIST
  • [2] DIJKSTRA G, 1985, ARCHITECTONISCHE KWA
  • [3] HERTZBERGER H, 1993, LESSONS STUDENTS A 1
  • [4] HERTZBERGER H, 1999, LESSONS STUDENTS A 2
  • [5] LANS W, 2000, EVALUATIE BLOK STAD
  • [6] PREISER FE, 1998, BUILDING PERFORMANCE, P233
  • [7] Preiser W.F. E., 1988, POSTOCCUPANCY EVALUA
  • [8] Schon D., 1991, REFLECTIVE PRACTITIO
  • [9] VANDERVOORDT TJM, 1993, J ARCHIT PLAN RES, V10, P341
  • [10] VANDERVOORDT TJM, 1990, SOCIAAL VEILIG ONTWE