Study of Urban Logistics Drone Path Planning Model Incorporating Service Benefit and Risk Cost

被引:8
|
作者
Shao, Quan [1 ]
Li, Jiaming [1 ]
Li, Ruoheng [1 ]
Zhang, Jiangao [1 ]
Gao, Xiaobo [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Civil Aviat, Nanjing 211106, Peoples R China
[2] Civil Aviat Elect Technol Co Ltd, Chengdu 610043, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
urban logistics; drones; path planning; risk cost; service benefit; optimization algorithms; OPTIMIZATION; OPERATIONS; CONFLICT; IMPACT; UAVS;
D O I
10.3390/drones6120418
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
The application of drones provides a powerful solution for "the last-mile" logistics services, while the large-scale implementation of logistics drone services will threaten the safety of buildings, pedestrians, vehicles, and other elements in the urban environment. The balance of risk cost and service benefit is accordingly crucial to managing logistics drones. In this study, we proposed a cost-benefit assessment model for quantifying risk cost and service benefit in the urban environment. In addition, a global heuristic path search rule was developed to solve the path planning problem based on risk mitigation and customer service. The cost-benefit assessment model quantifies the risk cost from three environmental elements (buildings, pedestrians, and vehicles) threatened by drone operations based on the collision probability, and the service benefit based on the characteristics of logistics service customers. To explore the effectiveness of the model in this paper, we simulate and analyse the effects of different risk combinations, unknown risk zones, and risk-benefit preferences on the path planning results. The results show that compared with the traditional shortest-distance method, the drone path planning method proposed in this paper can accurately capture the distribution of risks and customers in the urban environment. It is highly reusable in ensuring service benefits while reducing risk costs and generating a cost-effective path for logistics drones. We also compare the algorithm in this paper with the A* algorithm and verify that our algorithm improves the solution quality in complex environments.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An exploratory study of logistics service quality model
    Zheng, Bing
    Feng, Yixiong
    Tan, Jianrong
    Che, Junhua
    ADVANCES IN MATERIALS MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY II, 2006, 532-533 : 1052 - +
  • [32] A risk-benefit model incorporating serviceability loss functions
    Stewart, MG
    STRUCTURAL SAFETY AND RELIABILITY, VOLS. 1-3, 1998, : 287 - 294
  • [33] Path Choosing of Logistics Service Upgrading Driven by Big Data Empirical Study Based on AHP model
    Ma, Jie
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MANAGEMENT AND SOCIAL SCIENCES (ISMSS 2019), 2019, 309 : 74 - 78
  • [34] INCORPORATING RISK ASSESSMENT AND BENEFIT COST-ANALYSIS IN ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT
    RYCROFT, RW
    REGENS, JL
    DIETZ, T
    RISK ANALYSIS, 1988, 8 (03) : 415 - 420
  • [35] Unraveling the Urban Ecosystem: An Ethnographic Study of Logistics Service Providers
    de Tarragon, Hugo
    Theodoraki, Christina
    Hlady-Rispal, Martine
    Casteran, Gauthier
    JOURNAL OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2024, 60 (04) : 75 - 91
  • [36] COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS IN URBAN AND REGIONAL-PLANNING - SCHOFIELD,J
    VIELBA, C
    LOCAL GOVERNMENT STUDIES, 1988, 14 (04) : 72 - 73
  • [37] COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS IN URBAN AND REGIONAL-PLANNING - SCHOFIELD,J
    VOOGD, H
    TOWN PLANNING REVIEW, 1988, 59 (04): : 448 - 449
  • [38] COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS IN URBAN AND REGIONAL-PLANNING - SCHOFIELD,JA
    ROBERTS, P
    REGIONAL STUDIES, 1988, 22 (06) : 557 - 558
  • [39] Study on the Risk Evaluation of Logistics Service Delivery System
    Liu Mingfei
    Wang Qiong
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, VOLS I AND II, 2009, : 1422 - 1426
  • [40] COST-BENEFIT MODEL OF RURAL TO URBAN MIGRATION IN TAIWAN
    SPEARE, A
    POPULATION STUDIES-A JOURNAL OF DEMOGRAPHY, 1971, 25 (01): : 117 - 130