Heterogeneous firms, exports and pigouvian pollution tax: Does the abatement technology matter?

被引:23
作者
Bertarelli, Silvia [1 ]
Lodi, Chiara [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ferrara, Dept Econ & Management, Via Voltapaletto 11, I-44121 Ferrara, Italy
关键词
Export; Heterogeneous productivity; Environmental tax; Abatement technology; INTERNATIONAL-TRADE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.340
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Environmental regulations aim at influencing individual behaviour toward more efficient use of resources and adoption of greener technologies for a sustainable development of globalized economies. This work investigates how and to what extent firms are influenced by an environmental Pigouvian tax on their technology and trade decisions. By using an international trade model with monopolistic competition that accounts for the heterogeneity of firms in terms of productivity, it is theoretically examined the decision of introducing a green technology or keeping a pollutant less advanced technology. If all firms adopt a pollutant technology, the eco-tax lowers emissions through a selection mechanism because the least productive firms are forced to leave the market. By imposing higher compliance costs to active firms, export propensity is negatively influenced as well. When abatement technologies can be adopted, an additional source of pollution reduction is obtained. The environmental tax will positively affect eco-innovation propensity and, indirectly, export propensity. However, since the positive effect will strictly depend on the amount of firm productivity, environmental tax and costs of clean technology, the Pigouvian tax can foster eco-innovation across the largest and most productive firms only. Productivity enhancing policies tailored to firm characteristics, especially size, may be more successful in the diffusion of cleaner technologies across all firms. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1099 / 1110
页数:12
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Heterogeneous firms and the environment: a cap-and-trade program [J].
Anoulies, Lisa .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2017, 84 :84-101
[2]   Plants and productivity in international trade [J].
Bernard, AB ;
Eaton, J ;
Jensen, JB ;
Kortum, S .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2003, 93 (04) :1268-1290
[3]  
Bustos P., 2011, AM ECON REV, DOI [10.1257/AER.IOL_1.304, DOI 10.1257/AER.IOL_1.304]
[4]   Who invests more in advanced abatement technology? Theory and evidence [J].
Cao, Jing ;
Qiu, Larry D. ;
Zhou, Mohan .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 2016, 49 (02) :637-662
[5]   Induced clean technology adoption and international trade with heterogeneous firms [J].
Cui, Jingbo .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 26 (08) :924-954
[6]   Why are firms that export cleaner? International trade, abatement and environmental emissions [J].
Forslid, Rikard ;
Okubo, Toshihiro ;
Ulltveit-Moe, Karen Helene .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2018, 91 :166-183
[7]  
Helpman E., 2006, J ECON LIT, DOI [10.3386/W12091, DOI 10.3386/W12091]
[8]   Environmental regulation and innovation: A panel data study [J].
Jaffe, AB ;
Palmer, K .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1997, 79 (04) :610-619
[9]   Incentives for advanced pollution abatement technology at the industry level: An evaluation of policy alternatives [J].
Jung, CH ;
Krutilla, K ;
Boyd, R .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1996, 30 (01) :95-111
[10]   Trade and the Environment: The Role of Firm Heterogeneity [J].
Kreickemeier, Udo ;
Richter, Philipp M. .
REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 22 (02) :209-225