A review of the scope and measurement of postoperative quality of recovery

被引:97
作者
Bowyer, A. [1 ]
Jakobsson, J. [2 ]
Ljungqvist, O. [3 ,4 ]
Royse, C. [5 ]
机构
[1] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Dept Anaesthesia & Pain Management, Parkville, Vic 3050, Australia
[2] Danderyd Hosp, Karolinska Inst, Inst Clin Sci, Dept Anaesthesia & Intens Care, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Orebro Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Orebro, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Insitutet, Inst Mol Med & Surg, Karolinska, Sweden
[5] Univ Melbourne, Dept Surg, Ultrasound Educ Unit, Parkville, Vic 3052, Australia
关键词
CORONARY-ARTERY-BYPASS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; ENHANCED RECOVERY; AMBULATORY SURGERY; NONCARDIAC SURGERY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; MULTIMODAL APPROACH;
D O I
10.1111/anae.12730
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
To date, postoperative quality of recovery lacks a universally accepted definition and assessment technique. Current quality of recovery assessment tools vary in their development, breadth of assessment, validation, use of continuous vs dichotomous outcomes and focus on individual vs group recovery. They have progressed from identifying pure restitution of physiological parameters to multidimensional assessments of postoperative function and patient-focused outcomes. This review focuses on the progression of these tools towards an as yet unreached ideal that would provide multidimensional assessment of recovery over time at the individual and group level. A literature search identified 11 unique recovery assessment tools. The Postoperative Quality of Recovery Scale assesses recovery in multiple domains, including physiological, nociceptive, emotive, activities of daily living, cognition and patient satisfaction. It addresses recovery over time and compares individual patient data with base line, thus describing resumption of capacities and is an acceptable method for identification of individual patient recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:1266 / 1278
页数:13
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
Aaronson N, 2002, QUAL LIFE RES, V11, P193
[2]   Meta-analysis of non-randomized comparative studies of the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer [J].
Abraham, Ned S. ;
Byrne, Christopher M. ;
Young, Jane M. ;
Solomon, Michael J. .
ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 77 (07) :508-516
[3]  
ALDRETE JA, 1970, ANESTH ANAL CURR RES, V49, P924
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425787
[5]   Postoperative pain experience: Results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged [J].
Apfelbaum, JL ;
Chen, C ;
Mehta, SS ;
Gan, TJ .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2003, 97 (02) :534-540
[6]   Type I error inflation in the presence of a ceiling effect [J].
Austin, PC ;
Brunner, LJ .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 2003, 57 (02) :97-104
[7]  
Australian Council on Healthcare Standards (ACHS), 2012, AUSTR CLIN IND REP 2
[8]   Outcomes of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines:: A systematic review [J].
Bahtsevani, C ;
Udén, G ;
Willman, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2004, 20 (04) :427-433
[9]  
Bryson GL, 2006, CAN J ANAESTH, V53, P669, DOI 10.1007/BF03021625
[10]   Patient's satisfaction with perioperative care: development, validation, and application of a questionnaire [J].
Caljouw, M. A. A. ;
van Beuzekom, M. ;
Boer, F. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2008, 100 (05) :637-644