Spectrophotometric and visual evaluation of peri-implant soft tissue color

被引:31
作者
Benic, Goran I. [1 ]
Scherrer, Daniela
Sancho-Puchades, Manuel [1 ]
Thoma, Daniel S. [1 ]
Hammerle, Christoph H. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Clin Fixed & Removable Prosthodont & Dent Mat Sci, Ctr Dent Med, Plattenstr 11, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
color; dental; gingiva; implant; mucosa; peri-implant; soft tissue; spectrophotometry; spectrophotometer; thickness; CONTROLLED CLINICAL-TRIAL; BEAM COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; RESTORATIVE MATERIALS; CONSENSUS STATEMENTS; OPTICAL PHENOMENON; DENTAL IMPLANTS; BUCCAL BONE; AESTHETICS; ZIRCONIA; GINGIVA;
D O I
10.1111/clr.12781
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
AimTo spectrophotometrically and visually test whether the peri-implant mucosal color differs from the color of the natural gingiva. Material and methodsForty single implants in the incisor and premolar region of 40 patients were assessed 3-7years after implant placement. The differences of the color components lightness, chroma along red-green axis, chroma along yellow-blue axis, and the total color difference E between peri-implant mucosa and natural gingiva were measured with a spectrophotometer. The color difference between peri-implant mucosa and natural gingiva was visually evaluated by clinicians and rated as clinically visible or clinically invisible from speaking distance. The dimensions of peri-implant mucosa and gingiva at the mid-buccal aspect were evaluated by using cone-beam CT. Spearman analysis was performed to detect correlations between different variables. Two-sided t-test, ANOVA, Mann-Whitney, and Kruskal-Wallis tests were applied to detect differences between the groups. ResultsThe spectrophotometrically assessed color difference Delta E between peri-implant mucosa and natural gingiva amounted to 7.0 +/- 3.9. The peri-implant mucosa presented a significant dark, greenish and bluish discoloration in comparison with gingiva at control teeth. Clinical investigation revealed that in 60% of sites the color difference between peri-implant mucosa and natural gingiva was clinically visible from speaking distance. The threshold value Delta E for the extraoral clinical distinction of mucosal color differences measured 7.5. When comparing the groups with visible and invisible color differences with respect to the three color components, a significant difference was found only for chroma along yellow-blue axis. In the group with visible color difference, mucosa presented a bluish discoloration. Correlation analysis indicated that with an increase in mucosal thickness, a trend for smaller Delta E was found. ConclusionThe spectrophotometrically assessed color of the peri-implant mucosa revealed more dark, green and blue components compared to the natural gingiva. At 60% of the implants, peri-implant mucosal discoloration was visible from speaking distance. The sites with visible and those with invisible mucosal discolorations differed significantly only regarding the chroma along yellow-blue axis.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 200
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Belser U, 2004, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V19, P73
[2]   Spectrophotometric and visual evaluation of peri-implant soft tissue color [J].
Benic, Goran I. ;
Scherrer, Daniela ;
Sancho-Puchades, Manuel ;
Thoma, Daniel S. ;
Hammerle, Christoph H. F. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2017, 28 (02) :192-200
[3]   Novel digital imaging techniques to assess the outcome in oral rehabilitation with dental implants: a narrative review [J].
Benic, Goran I. ;
Elmasry, Moustafa ;
Haemmerle, Christoph H. F. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2015, 26 :86-96
[4]  
Benic GI, 2013, INT J PERIODONT REST, V33, P733, DOI 10.11607/prd.1514
[5]   Dimensions of buccal bone and mucosa at immediately placed implants after 7 years: a clinical and cone beam computed tomography study [J].
Benic, Goran I. ;
Mokti, Muizzaddin ;
Chen, Chun-Jung ;
Weber, Hans-Peter ;
Haemmerle, Christoph H. F. ;
Gallucci, German O. .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2012, 23 (05) :560-566
[6]   Systematic review of parameters and methods for the professional assessment of aesthetics in dental implant research [J].
Benic, Goran I. ;
Wolleb, Karin ;
Sancho-Puchades, Manuel ;
Haemmerle, Christoph H. F. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2012, 39 :160-192
[7]   Influence of abutment material on the gingival color of implant-supported all-ceramic restorations: a prospective multicenter study [J].
Bressan, Eriberto ;
Paniz, Gianluca ;
Lops, Diego ;
Corazza, Boris ;
Romeo, Eugenio ;
Favero, Gianantonio .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2011, 22 (06) :631-637
[8]   All-Ceramic Single-Tooth Implant Reconstructions Using Modified Zirconia Abutments: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of the Effect of Pink Veneering Ceramic on the Esthetic Outcomes [J].
Buechi, Dominik L. E. ;
Sailer, Irena ;
Fehmer, Vincent ;
Haemmerle, Christoph H. F. ;
Thoma, Daniel S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2014, 34 (01) :29-38
[9]  
CIE, 2004, PUBL CIE, V15, P3
[10]   Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch [J].
Douglas, R. Duane ;
Steinhauer, Tad J. ;
Wee, Alvin G. .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2007, 97 (04) :200-208