Validation of a More Reliable Method of Eye Drop Self-Administration

被引:2
作者
Freddo, Thomas F. [1 ,2 ]
Ho, Derek Y. [2 ]
Steenbakkers, Michelle [2 ]
Furtado, Nadine [2 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Coll Pharm & Hlth Sci Univ, Boston, MA USA
[2] Univ Waterloo, Sch Optometry & Vis Sci, Waterloo, ON, Canada
关键词
RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS; GLAUCOMA; MEDICATIONS; INFECTIONS;
D O I
10.1097/OPX.0000000000001535
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
SIGNIFICANCE We propose an alternative method for eye drop self-administration. Similar IOP reductions were found with this method compared with clinician instillation. The alternative method of self-administration potentially benefits patients who have trouble successfully instilling drops. PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to validate the efficacy of an alternative method of drop instillation. METHODS This study is a randomized controlled crossover clinical trial. Thirty participants were recruited. A drop of 0.5% timolol maleate was instilled into subject's eye on two separate visits. On one visit, eye drop instillation was by a trained clinician, and on the other, self-instillation using an alternative method was used. The order was randomly chosen. Intraocular pressure was measured before drop instillation and 2 hours after drop instillation. The investigator was masked during measurement, and an observer recorded the IOP measurements. RESULTS Mean +/- SD IOP measurement before 0.5% timolol maleate instillation measured 13.89 +/- 2.29 mmHg. An average reduction 3.75 +/- 2.36 mmHg was found with clinician administration, and an average reduction of 3.32 +/- 2.31 mmHg was recorded with the new method. No significance was found in IOP reduction between two groups P < .45. Percent reduction was 25.17 +/- 16.21% and 24.38 +/- 16.31% in clinician instillation and alternative instillation method group, respectively. No significant difference was found. This percentage reduction was similar to previously reported studies. No reported cases of eye infection or irritation were found in any case, within a 3-month follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS We have proposed a more reliable method for instillation that provides a larger area for instillation and lessen the risk of contamination and patient's fear for eye drops. Similar efficacy was found compared with that of having a clinician directly administer the drop. This alternative method could potentially benefit patients who require topical eye drop therapy and result in increased compliance.
引用
收藏
页码:496 / 502
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2003, Adherence to Long-Term Therapies: Evidence for action
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1878, ANALYST, DOI DOI 10.2307/2635758
  • [3] COMPARING METHODS OF MEASUREMENT - WHY PLOTTING DIFFERENCE AGAINST STANDARD METHOD IS MISLEADING
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1995, 346 (8982): : 1085 - 1087
  • [4] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [5] BRENNEN C, 1990, AM J MED, V88, pN14
  • [6] Patients prefer once-daily glaucoma drops
    Buller, Alex J.
    Morgan, Laurence H.
    Hercules, Brian L.
    [J]. GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 245 (02) : 293 - 294
  • [7] Use of eyedrops in glaucoma: how can we help to reduce non-compliance?
    Chawla, Anand
    McGalliard, Jim N.
    Batterbury, Mark
    [J]. ACTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2007, 85 (04): : 464 - 464
  • [8] THE EFFECTS OF TIMOLOL MALEATE AND ACETAZOLAMIDE ON THE RATE OF AQUEOUS FORMATION IN NORMAL HUMAN-SUBJECTS
    DAILEY, RA
    BRUBAKER, RF
    BOURNE, WM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1982, 93 (02) : 232 - 237
  • [9] Aids for eye drop administration
    Davies, Isaiah
    Williams, Andrew M.
    Muir, Kelly W.
    [J]. SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 62 (03) : 332 - 345
  • [10] Deming W. E., 1943, Statistical Adjustment of Data