Quantitative analysis of ultrasonographic images and cytology in relation to histopathology of canine and feline liver: An ex-vivo study

被引：13

作者：

Banzato, Tommaso ^{[1
]}

Gelain, Maria Elena ^{[2
]}

Aresu, Luca ^{[2
]}

Centelleghe, Cinzia ^{[2
]}

Benali, Silvia Lucia ^{[2
]}

Zotti, Alessandro ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Padua, Dept Anim Med Prod & Hlth, I-35020 Legnaro, PD, Italy

[2] Univ Padua, Dept Comparat Biomed & Food Sci, I-35020 Legnaro, PD, Italy

来源：

RESEARCH IN VETERINARY SCIENCE | 2015年 / 103卷

关键词：

Histogram analysis; Ultrasound; Liver; Cytology; Histopathology; NAKED EYE EVALUATION; ECHOGENICITY; ULTRASOUND; HISTOGRAM; ACCURACY; LESIONS; DOGS; QUANTIFICATION; INTENSITY; INFANTS;

D O I：

10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.10.002

中图分类号：

S85 [动物医学（兽医学）];

学科分类号：

0906 ;

摘要：

The aims of the present study were to investigate, in a standardized experimental condition, the usefulness of histogram analysis on ex-vivo ultrasonographic images of the liver of dogs and cats compared with histological alterations and to evaluate whether the combination of histogram parameters and cytology might improve diagnostic accuracy referring to optical microscopy as gold standard. Histogram-based parameters were calculated on ultrasonographic images of liver tissue samples collected from the cadavers of 68 dogs and 31 cats. Standard deviation of the histogram (SDH) had a higher sensitivity and specificity in the detection of the lesions in cat compared with dog. Matched results of cytology and SDH improved sensitivity and specificity in dog whereas no substantial improvement was evident in cat Quantitative analysis of ultrasonographic images of the liver in dog and cat could become a potentially useful tool in the distinction between normal and pathological organs. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：164 / 169

页数：6

共 26 条

[1]

[Anonymous], CANINE FELINE CYTOLO

[2] Accuracy of US-Guided FNA of Focal Liver Lesions in Dogs: 140 Cases (2005-2008) [J].

Bahr, Katherine L. ;

Sharkey, Leslie C. ;

Murakami, Tsuyoshi ;

Feeney, Daniel A. .

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ANIMAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION, 2013, 49 (03) :190-196

[3]

Beck AP, 2014, J MATERN-FETAL NEO M, V20, P1

[4]

d'Anjou M A., 2008, Atlas of Small Animal Ultrasonography, P217

[5] Quantification of hepatic and renal cortical echogenicity in clinically normal cats [J].

Drost, WT ;

Henry, GA ;

Meinkoth, JH ;

Woods, JP ;

Lehenbauer, TW .

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2000, 61 (09) :1016-1020

[6] DENSITOMETRIC MEASUREMENT OF RENAL ECHOGENICITY IN INFANTS AND NAKED EYE EVALUATION - A COMPARISON [J].

EGGERT, P ;

DEBUS, F ;

KRELLERLAUGWITZ, G ;

OPPERMANN, HC .

PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 1991, 21 (02) :111-113

[7] Gray scale histogram analysis of solid breast lesions with ultrasonography: can lesion echogenicity ratio be used to differentiate the malignancy? [J].

Erol, Bekir ;

Kara, Taylan ;

Gurses, Cemil ;

Karakoyun, Rojbin ;

Koroglu, Mert ;

Suren, Dinc ;

Bulbuller, Nurullah .

CLINICAL IMAGING, 2013, 37 (05) :871-875

[8] New look at endometrial echogenicity: objective computer-assisted measurements predict endometrial receptivity in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer [J].

Fanchin, R ;

Righini, C ;

Ayoubi, JM ;

Olivennes, F ;

de Ziegler, D ;

Frydman, R .

FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2000, 74 (02) :274-281

[9] Statistical relevance of ultrasonographic criteria in the assessment of diffuse liver disease in dogs and cats [J].

Feeney, Daniel A. ;

Anderson, Kari L. ;

Ziegler, Laura E. ;

Jessen, Carl R. ;

Daubs, Brian M. ;

Hardy, Robert M. .

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2008, 69 (02) :212-221

[10] ULTRASOUND STRUCTURE AND DIGITAL IMAGE-ANALYSIS OF THE SUBEPIDERMAL LOW ECHOGENIC BAND IN AGED HUMAN SKIN - DIURNAL CHANGES AND INTERINDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY [J].

GNIADECKA, M ;

GNIADECKI, R ;

SERUP, J ;

SONDERGAARD, J .

JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 1994, 102 (03) :362-365

← 1 2 3 →