Expansion of arbitrary stimulus classes and function-transfer measured by sorting performances

被引:6
作者
Arntzen, Erik [1 ]
Dechsling, Anders [1 ]
Fields, Lanny [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Oslo Metropolitan Univ, Oslo, Norway
[2] CUNY Queens Coll, New York, NY USA
[3] CUNY, Grad Sch, New York, NY USA
关键词
stimulus equivalence; matching-to-sample; sorting; class expansion; meaningful stimuli; CONDITIONAL-DISCRIMINATION; EQUIVALENCE;
D O I
10.1002/jeab.665
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Sorting (SRT) and matching-to-sample (MTS) tests have measured the formation of arbitrary stimulus classes. This experiment used SRT and MTS tests to document the expansion of class size. Thirty-two participants learned 12 conditional discriminations with a linear series training structure (A -> B -> C -> D -> E). SRT tests documented the formation of 5-member classes by 17 of the participants. Thereafter, 6-member class expansion was implemented by FC training. Nine of these 17 participants showed class expansion when tracked with a sequence of an SRT, MTS, and a final SRT test, and the other 8 showed expansion when tracked with a sequence of MTS and SRT tests. Thus, SRT tests documented class expansion, and the sequence of tests did not influence class expansion. The 15 participants who did not form the 5-member classes learned the baselines for new 3-member classes (A -> B -> C) and formed them as documented by an SRT test. Then, 4-member class expansion was implemented by FB training. Expansion was assessed using the above-mentioned testing sequences. All 15 showed class expansion with 100% correspondence between the SRT and MTS performances. Sorting documented the expansion of arbitrary stimulus classes, while the MTS tests showed that the stimuli also functioned as members of equivalence classes.
引用
收藏
页码:326 / 339
页数:14
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Probability of equivalence formation: Familiar stimuli and training sequence [J].
Arntzen, E .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RECORD, 2004, 54 (02) :275-291
[2]   The Relation Between Sorting Tests and Matching-to-Sample Tests in the Formation of Equivalence Classes [J].
Arntzen, Erik ;
Granmo, Sjur ;
Fields, Lanny .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RECORD, 2017, 67 (01) :81-96
[3]   Sorting: An Alternative Measure of Class Formation? [J].
Arntzen, Erik ;
Norbom, Aina ;
Fields, Lanny .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RECORD, 2015, 65 (04) :615-625
[4]   A Simpler Route to Stimulus Equivalence? A Replication and Further Exploration of a "Simple Discrimination Training Procedure" (Canovas, Debert and Pilgrim 2014) [J].
Dickins, David W. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RECORD, 2015, 65 (04) :637-647
[5]   AUDITORY SUCCESSIVE CONDITIONAL DISCRIMINATION AND AUDITORY STIMULUS EQUIVALENCE CLASSES [J].
DUBE, WV ;
GREEN, G ;
SERNA, RW .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1993, 59 (01) :103-114
[6]  
Dymond S., 2001, Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, V19, P8
[7]   THE STRUCTURE OF EQUIVALENCE CLASSES [J].
FIELDS, L ;
VERHAVE, T .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1987, 48 (02) :317-332
[8]   Stimulus Sorting: A Quick and Sensitive Index of Equivalence Class Formation [J].
Fields, Lanny ;
Arntzen, Erik ;
Moksness, Marie .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RECORD, 2014, 64 (03) :487-498
[9]  
Fienup D.M., 2006, European Journal of Behavior Analysis, V7, P87, DOI [10.1080/15021149.2006.11434266, DOI 10.1080/15021149.2006.11434266]
[10]  
GREEN G, 1990, AM J MENT RETARD, V95, P260