Onsets and codas in 1.5-year-olds' word recognition

被引:78
作者
Swingley, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Psychol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
Language acquisition; Lexical development; Word recognition; Phonology; Speech perception; EARLY LEXICAL REPRESENTATIONS; PHONETICALLY SIMILAR WORDS; EARLY RECEPTIVE LEXICON; SPEECH-PERCEPTION; SPOKEN WORDS; PHONOLOGICAL SPECIFICITY; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; YOUNG-CHILDREN; FLUENT SPEECH; EYE-MOVEMENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jml.2008.11.003
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Previous tests of toddlers' phonological knowledge of familiar words using word recognition tasks have examined syllable onsets but not word-final consonants (codas). However, there are good reasons to suppose that children's knowledge of coda consonants might be less complete than their knowledge of onset consonants. To test this hypothesis, the present study examined 14-22-month-old children's knowledge of the phonological forms of familiar words by measuring their comprehension of correctly pronounced and mispronounced instances of those words using a visual fixation task. Mispronunciations substituted onset or coda consonants. Adults were tested in the same task for comparison with children. Children and adults fixated named targets more upon hearing correct pronunciations than upon hearing mispronunciations, whether those mispronunciations involved the word's initial or final consonant. In addition, detailed analysis of the timing of adults' and children's eye movements provided clear evidence for incremental interpretation of the speech signal. Children's responses were slower and less accurate overall, but children and adults showed nearly identical temporal effects of the placement of phonological substitutions. The results demonstrate accurate encoding of consonants even in words children cannot yet say. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 269
页数:18
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]   Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models [J].
Allopenna, PD ;
Magnuson, JS ;
Tanenhaus, MK .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1998, 38 (04) :419-439
[2]   Phonological specificity in early words [J].
Bailey, TM ;
Plunkett, K .
COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, 2002, 17 (02) :1265-1282
[3]   Phonological specificity in children at I;2 [J].
Ballem, KD ;
Plunkett, K .
JOURNAL OF CHILD LANGUAGE, 2005, 32 (01) :159-173
[4]  
Bernhardt BarbaraH., 1998, HDB PHONOLOGICAL DEV
[5]   Mommy and Me -: Familiar names help launch babies into speech-stream segmentation [J].
Bortfeld, H ;
Morgan, JL ;
Golinkoff, RM ;
Rathbun, K .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 16 (04) :298-304
[6]   Simultaneous bilingualism and the perception of a language-specific vowel contrast in the first year of life [J].
Bosch, L ;
Sebastián-Gallés, N .
LANGUAGE AND SPEECH, 2003, 46 :217-243
[7]   Testing the protracted lexical restructuring hypothesis: The effects of position and acoustic-phonetic clarity on sensitivity to mispronunciations in children and adults [J].
Bowey, Judith A. ;
Hirakis, Eliana .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 95 (01) :1-17
[8]   The role of exposure to isolated words in early vocabulary development [J].
Brent, MR ;
Siskind, JM .
COGNITION, 2001, 81 (02) :B33-B44
[9]  
CANFIELD RL, 1997, MONOGRAPHS SOC RES C, V52
[10]   Development of language-specific phoneme representations in the infant brain [J].
Cheour, M ;
Ceponiene, R ;
Lehtokoski, A ;
Luuk, A ;
Allik, J ;
Alho, K ;
Naatanen, R .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 1998, 1 (05) :351-353