Cognitive impairment does not cause invalid performance: analyzing performance patterns among cognitively unimpaired, impaired, and noncredible participants across six performance validity tests

被引:76
作者
Critchfield, Edan [1 ]
Soble, Jason R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Marceaux, Janice C. [1 ,4 ]
Bain, Kathleen M. [1 ]
Chase Bailey, K. [5 ]
Webber, Troy A. [1 ]
Alex Alverson, W. [1 ]
Messerly, Johanna [1 ]
Gonzalez, David Andres [4 ]
O'Rourke, Justin J. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] South Texas Vet Hlth Care Syst, Psychol Serv, San Antonio, TX USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Coll Med, Dept Psychiat, Chicago, IL USA
[3] Univ Illinois, Coll Med, Dept Neurol, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Univ Texas Hlth Sci Ctr San Antonio, Dept Neurol, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
[5] UT Southwestern Med Ctr, Div Psychol, Dallas, TX USA
关键词
Performance validity; neuropsychological evaluation; service-connection; cognitive impairment; veterans; MEMORY MALINGERING TOMM; TRAUMATIC BRAIN-INJURY; RELIABLE DIGIT SPAN; FALSE DISCOVERY RATE; VERBAL-LEARNING TEST; CLASSIFICATION ACCURACY; RECOGNITION TRIAL; SCREENING MEASURE; RATES; SPECIFICITY;
D O I
10.1080/13854046.2018.1508615
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objective: Performance validity tests (PVTs) are essential in neuropsychological evaluations; however, it has been questioned how PVTs function in the context of cognitive impairment, and whether cognitive impairment alone is sufficient to cause PVT failure. Further, there is concern that some clinicians will disregard failed PVTs due to their perception that failures represent false-positive errors secondary to cognitive impairment. This study examined patterns associated with cognitively impaired versus noncredible performance across a battery of PVTs and neuropsychological tests. Additionally, the impact of VA service-connection and disability-seeking status on test validity was investigated. Method: A mixed-clinical sample of 103 veterans were administered six PVTs and neuropsychological tests. Performance was compared across three groups: valid-cognitively unimpaired, valid-cognitively impaired, and noncredible. Results: Significant PVT score differences and failure rates emerged across the three groups, with nonsignificant to small differences between valid-unimpaired and valid-impaired groups, and large differences between impaired and noncredible groups. In contrast, there were nonsignificant to small differences on neuropsychological tests between the valid-impaired and noncredible groups, indicating that impaired participants performed significantly better on PVTs despite comparable neurocognitive test scores. Service-connection rating itself was not associated with PVT failure, but an active disability claim to increase and/or establish service connection was associated with worse PVT performance. Conclusion: This study supports the use of multiple PVTs during evaluations of patients with varied cognitive abilities. Results indicated increased risk of PVT failure in patients who were seeking initiation/increase in service-connected payments, and shows that cognitive impairment does not cause PVT failure.
引用
收藏
页码:1083 / 1101
页数:19
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
American Psychiatric Association, 2013, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596.DSM05
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, The Word Memory Test: A user's guide to the oral and computer-administered forms
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Advanced clinical solutions for WAIS-IV and WMS-IV: Administration and scoring manual
[4]   Performance and Symptom Validity Testing as a Function of Medical Board Evaluation in US Military Service Members with a History of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury [J].
Armistead-Jehle, Patrick ;
Cole, Wesley R. ;
Stegman, Robert L. .
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 33 (01) :120-124
[5]   Clinical utility of the Rey 15-Item Test, recognition trial, and error scores for detecting noncredible neuropsychological performance in a mixed clinical sample of veterans [J].
Bailey, K. Chase ;
Soble, Jason R. ;
O'Rourke, Justin J. F. .
CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2018, 32 (01) :119-131
[6]  
Bain K.M., 2017, Assessment
[7]   A Comparison of the Degree of Effort Involved in the TOMM and the ACS Word Choice Test Using a Dual-Task Paradigm [J].
Barhon, Lucienne Isabel ;
Batchelor, Jennifer ;
Meares, Susanne ;
Chekaluk, Eugene ;
Shores, E. Arthur .
APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY-ADULT, 2015, 22 (02) :114-123
[8]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[9]   Effort, symptom validity testing, performance validity testing and traumatic brain injury [J].
Bigler, Erin D. .
BRAIN INJURY, 2014, 28 (13-14) :1623-1638
[10]  
Boone K., 2007, Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment