Saline-sodic soil improvers and their effect on the development of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum)

被引:2
|
作者
Abigail Martinez-Sias, Valeria [1 ]
de Jesus Martinez-Hernandez, Jose [1 ]
Zuniga-Estrada, Lamberto [2 ]
Felipe Martinez-Montoya, Juan [1 ]
机构
[1] Colegio Postgrad, Innovac Manejo Recursos Nat, Campus San Luis Potosi,C Iturbide 73, Salinas De Hidalgo 78622, Slp, Mexico
[2] Inst Nacl Invest Forestales, Carretera Tampico Mante Km 55, Villa Cuauhtemoc 89610, Tamaulipas, Mexico
来源
关键词
Crop yield; elemental sulfur-chicken manure; salt tolerant crop; saline-sodic water; ELEMENTAL SULFUR OXIDATION;
D O I
10.19136/era.a9n1.3086
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The tomato is the main vegetable of greater economic importance at international and national level, whose production is limited when it is established in saline-sodium soils and irrigated with saline water, abiotic conditions present in arid and semi-arid regions of Mexico. The objective was to evaluate the effect of elemental sulfur (Sffi) and chicken manure on morphological indices, biomass production and tomato yield, grown in a saline-sodium soil and irrigated with saline water. The tomato saladette hybrid Conan USATX 2112 was established in a shade-mesh greenhouse at Moctezuma S.L.P., on saline-sodium soil; A 2x4 factorial treatment design was used, with two doses of sulfur, 750 (S-1) and 1 500 kg ha (1) (S2) and four doses of chicken manure (1, 2, 3 and 4 t ha (1)). In the plant, five non-destructive samplings were carried out at 14, 24, 30, 45, 69 days after transplantation (DAT), estimating the morphological components. In the same way, at 54, 63 and 83 DAT, destructive samplings were carried out, evaluating the total fresh and dry matter (DM), and its distribution by plant structure, weight and fruit yield. The morphological components were positively and significantly affected by the addition of 750 kg ha (1) (S1), with respect to the treatment of 1 500 kg ha (1) (S-2). In treatment S-1 had a higher percentage of DM in fruit (35%), while S-2 only 18%. The doses of chicken manure did not show significant differences in any of the evaluated variables.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] LEACHING OF A HIGHLY SALINE-SODIC SOIL
    LEFFELAAR, PA
    SHARMA, RP
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1977, 32 (3-4) : 203 - 218
  • [2] SALT LEACHING AND THE EFFECT OF GYPSUM APPLICATION IN A SALINE-SODIC SOIL
    KHOSLA, BK
    GUPTA, RK
    ABROL, IP
    AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 1979, 2 (03) : 193 - 202
  • [3] Amelioration of saline-sodic soil by flushing and leaching
    Zaka, M. A.
    Rafa, H. U.
    Mehdi, S. M.
    Rehman, O. U.
    SOIL & ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 27 (02) : 171 - 176
  • [4] Effect of some amendments on leachate properties of a calcareous saline-sodic soil
    Yazdanpanah, N.
    Pazira, E.
    Neshat, A.
    Naghavi, H.
    Moezi, A. A.
    Mahmoodabadi, M.
    INTERNATIONAL AGROPHYSICS, 2011, 25 (03) : 307 - 310
  • [5] EFFECT OF FREQUENCY OF SODIC AND SALINE-SODIC IRRIGATIONS AND GYPSUM ON THE BUILDUP OF SODIUM IN SOIL AND CROP YIELDS
    BAJWA, MS
    JOSAN, AS
    CHOUDHARY, OP
    IRRIGATION SCIENCE, 1993, 14 (01) : 21 - 26
  • [6] STABILITY OF A CALCAREOUS SALINE-SODIC SOIL DURING RECLAMATION
    LEBRON, I
    SUAREZ, DL
    ALBERTO, F
    SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1994, 58 (06) : 1753 - 1762
  • [7] Reclamation of a saline-sodic soil by gypsum and Leptochloa fusca
    Qadir, M
    Qureshi, RH
    Ahmad, N
    GEODERMA, 1996, 74 (3-4) : 207 - 217
  • [8] HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY AND LEACHING OF AN ORGANIC SALINE-SODIC SOIL
    KOSMAS, C
    MOUSTAKAS, N
    GEODERMA, 1990, 46 (04) : 363 - 370
  • [9] Effect of saline-sodic solutions on column leaching of potassium from sandy soil
    Jalali, Mohsen
    ARCHIVES OF AGRONOMY AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2011, 57 (04) : 377 - 390
  • [10] Chemical and organic amendments in reclamation of saline-sodic soil in greenhouse
    Miranda, Marcelo A.
    de Oliveira, Emanoel E. M.
    dos Santos, Karen C. F.
    Freire, Maria B. G. dos S.
    de Almeida, Brivaldo G.
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ENGENHARIA AGRICOLA E AMBIENTAL, 2011, 15 (05): : 484 - 490