Treatment outcomes of cetuximab-containing regimen in locoregional recurrent and distant metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

被引:7
作者
Chen, Tien-Hua [1 ,2 ]
Pan, Yi-Ying [2 ,3 ]
Lee, Tsung-Lun [2 ,4 ]
Wang, Ling-Wei [2 ,3 ]
Tai, Shyh-Kuan [2 ,4 ]
Chu, Pen-Yuan [2 ,4 ]
Lo, Wen-Liang [5 ,6 ]
Wu, Cheng-Hsien [5 ,6 ]
Yang, Muh-Hwa [1 ,7 ]
Chang, Peter Mu-Hsin [1 ,2 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Oncol, Div Med Oncol, 201,Sec 2,Shipai Rd, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
[2] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Oncol, Div Radiat Oncol, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Otolaryngol, Taipei, Taiwan
[5] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Dent, Taipei, Taiwan
[6] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Stomatol, Div Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Taipei, Taiwan
[7] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Inst Clin Med, Taipei, Taiwan
[8] Natl Yang Ming Chiao Tung Univ, Inst Biopharmaceut Sci, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Cetuximab; Cetuximab-based chemotherapy; Locoregional recurrence; Distant metastasis; Recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck; CHEMOTHERAPY PLUS CETUXIMAB; 1ST-LINE TREATMENT; RADIATION-THERAPY; OPEN-LABEL; REIRRADIATION; PACLITAXEL; CISPLATIN; PLATINUM; SALVAGE; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-022-10440-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Recurrent/ metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck (R/M SCCNH) is still a difficult-to-treat disease with poor clinical outcomes and limited treatment choices. In view of locoregional recurrent versus distant metastatic SCCHN, the therapeutic efficacy of cetuximab-containing regimen and relevant prognostic factors for these two groups may be different. Thus, the aim of this study was to explore the treatment outcomes of cetuximab-containing regimen in locoregional recurrent and distant metastatic SCCHN groups, and to identify clinical factors correlated with better survival outcomes. Methods From 2016 to 2020, patients with R/M SCCHN who received cetuximab-containing regimen in our institute were enrolled in this study. Clinical outcomes including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were evaluated in both locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis groups. Exploratory analysis were conducted to investigate major clinical features associated with better outcomes. Results A total of 107 patients with locoregional recurrent SCCHN (N = 66) and distant metastatic SCCNH (N = 41) who received cetuximab-containing regimen were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients with oral cavity cancer and patients with disease recurrence within 6 months after radiation therapy were significantly increased in locoregional recurrence group. The median OS (15.6 vs. 9.7 months, P = 0.004) and PFS (5.8 months vs. 4.2 months, P = 0.008) were longer in locoregional recurrence group than in distant metastasis group. In multivariate analysis of clinical features, locoregional recurrence was still an important risk factor associated with better OS (Hazzard ratio (HR) 0.64, p = 0.06) and PFS (HR 0.67, p = 0.075). In addition, a trend of favorable disease control rate (DCR; 62.5% vs. 45.0%, p = 0.056) was noted in locoregional recurrence group. In locoregional recurrence group, prior salvage surgery was associated with longer OS (HR = 0.24, P = 0.008) and PFS (HR = 0.30, P = 0.005). Conclusion SCCHN with locoregional recurrence is associated with better disease control and survival outcomes comparing to distant metastatic SCCHN when treated with cetuximab-containing regimen. Salvage surgery for locoregional recurrence may further improves clinical outcome.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Prognostic factors and long-term survivorship in patients with recurrent or metastatic carcinoma of the head and neck - An analysis of two Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group randomized trials [J].
Argiris, A ;
Li, Y ;
Forastiere, A .
CANCER, 2004, 101 (10) :2222-2229
[2]   Postoperative irradiation with or without concomitant chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer [J].
Bernier, J ;
Domenge, C ;
Ozsahin, M ;
Matuszewska, K ;
Lefèbvre, JL ;
Greiner, RH ;
Giralt, J ;
Maingon, P ;
Rolland, F ;
Bolla, M ;
Cognetti, F ;
Bourhis, J ;
Kirkpatrick, A ;
van Glabbeke, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 350 (19) :1945-1952
[3]  
Bray F, 2018, CA-CANCER J CLIN, V68, P394, DOI [10.3322/caac.21492, 10.3322/caac.21609]
[4]   Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study [J].
Burtness, Barbara ;
Harrington, Kevin J. ;
Greil, Richard ;
Soulieres, Denis ;
Tahara, Makoto ;
de Castro, Gilberto, Jr. ;
Psyrri, Amanda ;
Baste, Neus ;
Neupane, Prakash ;
Bratland, Ase ;
Fuereder, Thorsten ;
Hughes, Brett G. M. ;
Mesia, Ricard ;
Ngamphaiboon, Nuttapong ;
Rordorf, Tamara ;
Ishak, Wan Zamaniah Wan ;
Hong, Ruey-Long ;
Mendoza, Rene Gonzalez ;
Roy, Ananya ;
Zhang, Yayan ;
Gumuscu, Burak ;
Cheng, Jonathan D. ;
Jin, Fan ;
Rischin, Danny .
LANCET, 2019, 394 (10212) :1915-1928
[5]   Locoregionally recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: incidence, survival, prognostic factors, and treatment outcomes [J].
Chang, Jer-Hwa ;
Wu, Chia-Che ;
Yuan, Kevin Sheng-Po ;
Wu, Alexander T. H. ;
Wu, Szu-Yuan .
ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (33) :55600-55612
[6]   Long-term Follow-up of the RTOG 9501/Intergroup Phase III Trial: Postoperative Concurrent Radiation Therapy and Chemotherapy in High-Risk Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck [J].
Cooper, Jay S. ;
Zhang, Qiang ;
Pajak, Thomas F. ;
Forastiere, Arlene A. ;
Jacobs, John ;
Saxman, Scott B. ;
Kish, Julie A. ;
Kim, Harold E. ;
Cmelak, Anthony J. ;
Rotman, Marvin ;
Lustig, Robert ;
Ensley, John F. ;
Thorstad, Wade ;
Schultz, Christopher J. ;
Yom, Sue S. ;
Ang, K. Kian .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 84 (05) :1198-1205
[7]   New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) [J].
Eisenhauer, E. A. ;
Therasse, P. ;
Bogaerts, J. ;
Schwartz, L. H. ;
Sargent, D. ;
Ford, R. ;
Dancey, J. ;
Arbuck, S. ;
Gwyther, S. ;
Mooney, M. ;
Rubinstein, L. ;
Shankar, L. ;
Dodd, L. ;
Kaplan, R. ;
Lacombe, D. ;
Verweij, J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (02) :228-247
[8]  
ema.europa.eu, 2022, ERBITUXHC55820026 EP
[9]   Long-Term Results of RTOG 91-11: A Comparison of Three Nonsurgical Treatment Strategies to Preserve the Larynx in Patients With Locally Advanced Larynx Cancer [J].
Forastiere, Arlene A. ;
Zhang, Qiang ;
Weber, Randal S. ;
Maor, Moshe H. ;
Goepfert, Helmuth ;
Pajak, Thomas F. ;
Morrison, William ;
Glisson, Bonnie ;
Trotti, Andy ;
Ridge, John A. ;
Thorstad, Wade ;
Wagner, Henry ;
Ensley, John F. ;
Cooper, Jay S. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (07) :845-852
[10]   Cetuximab, docetaxel, and cisplatin versus platinum, fluorouracil, and cetuximab as first-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (GORTEC 2014-01 TPExtreme): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial [J].
Guigay, Joel ;
Auperin, Anne ;
Fayette, Jerome ;
Saada-Bouzid, Esma ;
Lafond, Cedrik ;
Taberna, Miren ;
Geoffrois, Lionnel ;
Martin, Laurent ;
Capitain, Olivier ;
Cupissol, Didier ;
Castanie, Helene ;
Vansteene, Damien ;
Schafhausen, Philippe ;
Johnson, Alison ;
Even, Caroline ;
Sire, Christian ;
Duplomb, Sophie ;
Evrard, Camille ;
Delord, Jean-Pierre ;
Laguerre, Brigitte ;
Zanetta, Sylvie ;
Chevassus-Clement, Cecile ;
Fraslin, Alderic ;
Louat, Fanny ;
Sinigaglia, Laura ;
Keilholz, Ulrich ;
Bourhis, Jean ;
Mesia, Ricard .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2021, 22 (04) :463-475