The Interactive Effects of Ambivalence and Certainty on Political Opinion Stability

被引:12
作者
Luttrell, Andrew [1 ]
Petty, Richard E. [2 ]
Brinol, Pablo [3 ]
机构
[1] Ball State Univ, Dept Psychol Sci, 2000 W Univ Ave, Muncie, IN 47306 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Psychol, Columbus, OH USA
[3] Univ Autonoma Madrid, Fac Psicol, Madrid, Spain
关键词
attitude stability; certainty; ambivalence; attitude strength; public opinion; ATTITUDINAL AMBIVALENCE; DISCREPANCIES; ACCESSIBILITY; CONSEQUENCES; POLARIZATION; STRENGTH; MODEL; BASES;
D O I
10.5964/jspp.v8i2.1247
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Some political attitudes and opinions shift and fluctuate over time whereas others remain fairly stable. Prior research on attitude strength has documented several features of attitudes that predict their temporal stability. The present analysis focuses on two of them: attitudinal ambivalence and certainty. Each of these variables has received mixed support for its relationship with attitude stability. A recent set of studies, however, has addressed this link by showing that ambivalence and certainty interact to predict stability. Because those studies relied exclusively on college student samples and considered issues that may have been especially likely to evince change over time, the present analysis aimed to replicate the original findings in a sample of registered Florida voters with an important politically relevant issue: abortion. Results of these analyses replicated the previous findings and support the generalizability of the ambivalence (x) certainty interaction on attitude stability to a sample of registered voters reporting their attitudes toward abortion. Implications for public opinion and the psychology of political attitudes are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 541
页数:17
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   CONVICTION [J].
ABELSON, RP .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1988, 43 (04) :267-275
[2]   MASS POLITICAL-ATTITUDES AND SURVEY RESPONSE [J].
ACHEN, CH .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1975, 69 (04) :1218-1231
[3]   Attitudinal ambivalence: A test of three key hypotheses [J].
Armitage, CJ ;
Conner, M .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2000, 26 (11) :1421-1432
[4]   THE GENERALITY OF THE AUTOMATIC ATTITUDE ACTIVATION EFFECT [J].
BARGH, JA ;
CHAIKEN, S ;
GOVENDER, R ;
PRATTO, F .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 62 (06) :893-912
[5]   GENDER AND ABORTION ATTITUDES RELIGIOSITY AS A SUPPRESSOR VARIABLE [J].
Barkan, Steven E. .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2014, 78 (04) :940-950
[6]   Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength [J].
Bassili, JN .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 71 (04) :637-653
[7]   Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses [J].
Brambor, T ;
Clark, WR ;
Golder, M .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2006, 14 (01) :63-82
[8]   PERSUASION: INSIGHTS FROM THE SELF-VALIDATION HYPOTHESIS [J].
Brinol, Pablo ;
Petty, Richard E. .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 41, 2009, 41 :69-+
[9]   A new look at the consequences of attitude certainty: The amplification hypothesis [J].
Clarkson, Joshua J. ;
Tormala, Zakary L. ;
Rucker, Derek D. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 95 (04) :810-825
[10]  
Conner M, 2010, FRONT SOC PSYCHOL, P261