共 25 条
[1]
INTERVAL BETWEEN PREEXPOSURE AND TEST DETERMINES THE MAGNITUDE OF LATENT INHIBITION - IMPLICATIONS FOR AN INTERFERENCE ACCOUNT
[J].
ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR,
1994, 22 (02)
:188-194
[2]
Bolles R. C., 1991, HEDONICS TASTE, P127
[4]
CONDITIONED FLAVOR PREFERENCES BASED ON HUNGER LEVEL DURING ORIGINAL FLAVOR EXPOSURE
[J].
ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR,
1983, 11 (01)
:107-115
[5]
Delay-induced super-latent inhibition as a function of order of exposure to two flavours prior to compound conditioning
[J].
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION B-COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY,
2005, 58 (01)
:1-18
[6]
An empirical analysis of the super-latent inhibition effect
[J].
ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR,
2002, 30 (02)
:112-120
[7]
Super-latent inhibition with delayed conditioned taste aversion testing
[J].
ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR,
2000, 28 (04)
:389-399
[8]
Latent inhibition and contextual associations
[J].
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL BEHAVIORAL PROCESSES,
2002, 28 (02)
:123-136
[9]
HUNGER ENHANCES THE EXPRESSION OF CALORIE-MEDIATED BUT NOT TASTE-MEDIATED CONDITIONED FLAVOR PREFERENCES
[J].
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL BEHAVIOR PROCESSES,
1987, 13 (01)
:73-79
[10]
HOLMAN EW, 1975, ANIM LEARN BEHAV, V6, P91