Why Do We Hold Mixed Emotions About Racial Out-Groups? A Case for Affect Matching

被引:38
作者
Barlow, Fiona Kate [1 ]
Hornsey, Matthew J. [2 ]
Hayward, Lydia E. [3 ]
Houkamau, Carla A. [4 ]
Kang, Jemima [1 ]
Milojev, Petar [5 ]
Sibley, Chris G. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Psychol, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, UQ Business Sch, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ New South Wales, Sch Psychol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Auckland, Sch Management & Int Business, Auckland, New Zealand
[5] Univ Auckland, Sch Psychol, Auckland, New Zealand
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
racial and ethnic attitudes and relations; intergroup dynamics; emotions; prejudice; open materials; NEGATIVE INTERGROUP CONTACT; COLLECTIVE ACTION; POSITIVE CONTACT; SOCIAL SUPPORT; PREJUDICE; SATISFACTION; COMMUNITY; CONFLICT; MINORITY; MAJORITY;
D O I
10.1177/0956797619844269
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A four-wave survey on a national probabilistic sample (N = 17,399) tested novel predictions about how positive and negative contact with racial out-groups predicts warmth and anger toward those groups. Three competing hypotheses were tested: (a) that negative contact will outweigh positive contact when predicting both emotions ("bad is stronger than good"); (b) that negative and positive contact will similarly predict each emotion; and (c) that negative contact will have a disproportionately large association with anger (a negative emotion), whereas positive contact will have a disproportionately large association with warmth (a positive emotion)-a phenomenon known as affect matching. The data revealed clear evidence for affect matching: Negative contact was associated with high levels of anger more than low levels of warmth, whereas positive contact was associated with high levels of warmth more than low levels of anger. Results suggest that positive and negative feelings about out-groups may be tied to qualitatively distinct contact experiences.
引用
收藏
页码:917 / 929
页数:13
相关论文
共 43 条
[11]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ATTITUDES AND EVALUATIVE SPACE - A CRITICAL-REVIEW, WITH EMPHASIS ON THE SEPARABILITY OF POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE SUBSTRATES [J].
CACIOPPO, JT ;
BERNTSON, GG .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1994, 115 (03) :401-423
[12]   Trajectories of interethnic contact and prejudice in a four-waves study of Romanian teenager-parent pairs [J].
Cernat, Vasile .
JOURNAL OF ETHNIC AND MIGRATION STUDIES, 2017, 43 (15) :2669-2687
[13]   The Separation of Between-Person and Within-Person Components of Individual Change Over Time: A Latent Curve Model With Structured Residuals [J].
Curran, Patrick J. ;
Howard, Andrea L. ;
Bainter, Sierra A. ;
Lane, Stephanie T. ;
McGinley, James S. .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 82 (05) :879-894
[14]  
DISHION TJ, 1995, CHILD DEV, V66, P139, DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1995.tb00861.x
[15]   Beyond prejudice: Are negative evaluations the problem and is getting us to like one another more the solution? [J].
Dixon, John ;
Levine, Mark ;
Reicher, Steve ;
Durrheim, Kevin .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2012, 35 (06) :411-425
[16]   A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition [J].
Fiske, ST ;
Cuddy, AJC ;
Glick, P ;
Xu, J .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 82 (06) :878-902
[17]  
Gaertner S.L., 1986, Prejudice, discrimination, and racism, P61
[18]   The Scope of Our Affective Influences: When and How Naturally Occurring Positive, Negative, and Neutral Affects Alter Judgment [J].
Gasper, Karen ;
Danube, Cinnamon L. .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2016, 42 (03) :385-399
[19]  
Giner-Sorolla Roger., 2013, Judging passions: Moral emotions in persons and groups
[20]   The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism [J].
Glick, P ;
Fiske, ST .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 70 (03) :491-512