Why Do We Hold Mixed Emotions About Racial Out-Groups? A Case for Affect Matching

被引:38
作者
Barlow, Fiona Kate [1 ]
Hornsey, Matthew J. [2 ]
Hayward, Lydia E. [3 ]
Houkamau, Carla A. [4 ]
Kang, Jemima [1 ]
Milojev, Petar [5 ]
Sibley, Chris G. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Psychol, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, UQ Business Sch, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ New South Wales, Sch Psychol, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Univ Auckland, Sch Management & Int Business, Auckland, New Zealand
[5] Univ Auckland, Sch Psychol, Auckland, New Zealand
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
racial and ethnic attitudes and relations; intergroup dynamics; emotions; prejudice; open materials; NEGATIVE INTERGROUP CONTACT; COLLECTIVE ACTION; POSITIVE CONTACT; SOCIAL SUPPORT; PREJUDICE; SATISFACTION; COMMUNITY; CONFLICT; MINORITY; MAJORITY;
D O I
10.1177/0956797619844269
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A four-wave survey on a national probabilistic sample (N = 17,399) tested novel predictions about how positive and negative contact with racial out-groups predicts warmth and anger toward those groups. Three competing hypotheses were tested: (a) that negative contact will outweigh positive contact when predicting both emotions ("bad is stronger than good"); (b) that negative and positive contact will similarly predict each emotion; and (c) that negative contact will have a disproportionately large association with anger (a negative emotion), whereas positive contact will have a disproportionately large association with warmth (a positive emotion)-a phenomenon known as affect matching. The data revealed clear evidence for affect matching: Negative contact was associated with high levels of anger more than low levels of warmth, whereas positive contact was associated with high levels of warmth more than low levels of anger. Results suggest that positive and negative feelings about out-groups may be tied to qualitatively distinct contact experiences.
引用
收藏
页码:917 / 929
页数:13
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Positive intergroup contact, negative intergroup contact, and threat as predictors of cognitive and affective dimensions of prejudice [J].
Aberson, Christopher L. .
GROUP PROCESSES & INTERGROUP RELATIONS, 2015, 18 (06) :743-760
[2]  
Allport G., 1954, Becoming
[3]   Positive and negative intergroup contact: Interaction not asymmetry [J].
Arnadottir, Katrin ;
Lolliot, Simon ;
Brown, Rupert ;
Hewstone, Miles .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 48 (06) :784-800
[4]   The Contact Caveat: Negative Contact Predicts Increased Prejudice More Than Positive Contact Predicts Reduced Prejudice [J].
Barlow, Fiona Kate ;
Paolini, Stefania ;
Pedersen, Anne ;
Hornsey, Matthew J. ;
Radke, Helena R. M. ;
Harwood, Jake ;
Rubin, Mark ;
Sibley, Chris G. .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2012, 38 (12) :1629-1643
[5]  
Baumeister RF., 2001, Review of General Psychology, V5, P323, DOI [10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323, DOI 10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323]
[6]   Friend or Ally: Whether Cross-Group Contact Undermines Collective Action Depends on What Advantaged Group Members Say (or Don't Say) [J].
Becker, Julia C. ;
Wright, Stephen C. ;
Lubensky, Micah E. ;
Zhou, Shelly .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2013, 39 (04) :442-455
[7]   MEASUREMENT OF PSYCHOLOGICAL ANDROGYNY [J].
BEM, SL .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 42 (02) :155-162
[8]   On the Practical Interpretability of Cross-Lagged PanelModels: Rethinking a Developmental Workhorse [J].
Berry, Daniel ;
Willoughby, Michael T. .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 88 (04) :1186-1206
[9]   MOOD AND MEMORY [J].
BOWER, GH .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1981, 36 (02) :129-148
[10]   The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? [J].
Brewer, MB .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES, 1999, 55 (03) :429-444