Abortion attitudes in context: A multidimensional vignette approach

被引:56
作者
Hans, Jason D. [1 ]
Kimberly, Claire [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Dept Family Sci, Lexington, KY 40514 USA
[2] Univ So Mississippi, Dept Child & Family Studies, Hattiesburg, MS 39406 USA
关键词
Abortion; Attitudes; Multiple-segment factorial vignette; Survey methodology; UNITED-STATES; PREGNANCY INTENTIONS; MALE INVOLVEMENT; DETERMINANTS; PARTNER; WOMEN; CONSEQUENCES; AGREEMENT; DYNAMICS; RELIGION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.06.001
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
The effects of relationship status, rationale for considering abortion (life circumstance versus health issue), and the male partner's wishes on abortion attitudes were examined using a multiple-segment factorial vignette with a probability sample of 532 Kentucky households. Respondents expressed strong opinions in the absence of contextual details, yet many shifted the direction of their strongly-held positions once contextual information was revealed that challenged their initial assumptions. Results confirm and extend prior research by indicating that attitudes are strongly held but are simultaneously highly responsive to context. The validity of surveys and polls that attempt to measure global attitudes toward abortion, such as pro-choice versus pro-life, in the absence of contextual details is therefore questioned. The full context of one's life and situation is weighed in the abortion decision-making process, and our findings indicate that attitudes toward abortion are largely responsive and reflective of that context as well. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 156
页数:12
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2012, Assessing the representativeness of public opinion surveys
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2012, US TODAY GALLOP POLL
  • [3] Life and death decisions - America's changing attitudes towards genetic engineering, genetic testing and abortion, 1972-98
    Bane, A
    Brown, L
    Carter, J
    Cote, C
    Crider, K
    de la Forest, S
    Livingston, M
    Montero, D
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL WORK, 2003, 46 (02) : 209 - +
  • [4] Couples' fertility and contraceptive decision-making in developing countries: Hearing the man's voice
    Bankole, A
    Singh, S
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1998, 24 (01): : 15 - 24
  • [5] Are partners available for post-abortion contraceptive counseling? A pilot study in a Baltimore City clinic
    Beenhakker, B
    Becker, S
    Hires, S
    Di Targiana, NM
    Blumenthal, P
    Huggins, G
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2004, 69 (05) : 419 - 423
  • [6] Bennett W.L., 1980, PUBLIC OPINION AM PO
  • [7] Work and Family Research in the First Decade of the 21st Century
    Bianchi, Suzanne M.
    Milkie, Melissa A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY, 2010, 72 (03) : 705 - 725
  • [8] Understanding why women seek abortions in the US
    Biggs, M. Antonia
    Gould, Heather
    Foster, Diana Greene
    [J]. BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2013, 13
  • [9] Bijma, 2007, EUROPEAN CLIN OBSTET, V3, P89, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1007/s11296-007-0070-0, DOI 10.1007/S11296-007-0070-0]
  • [10] The measurement of public opinion on abortion: The effects of survey design
    Bumpass, LL
    [J]. FAMILY PLANNING PERSPECTIVES, 1997, 29 (04): : 177 - 180