Towards a Real-Time Smart Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) of Safety Critical Embedded Systems

被引:2
作者
Pimentel, Juliano [1 ]
McEwan, Alistair A. [1 ]
Yu, Hong Qing [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Derby, Sch Comp & Engn, Derby DE22 1GB, England
来源
2022 25TH EUROMICRO CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL SYSTEM DESIGN (DSD) | 2022年
关键词
PHM; Machine Learning; Safety-Critical Systems; Embedded Systems; Condition Monitoring; Remaining Useful Life; Fault Prediction; LSTM; Neural Networks; Support Vector Regression; Decision Tree; Logistic Regression; NEURAL-NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1109/DSD57027.2022.00098
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Machine learning techniques for the prognostics and health management of safety critical embedded systems is an area that has raised an increased interest recently. This paper investigates an implementable machine learning pipeline to address PHM requirements. Different types of machine learning techniques are evaluated on a real case study considering accuracy and real-time effectiveness. The referred system exhibited abnormal behaviour with multiple faults during an observed period, which led it to a low system availability and required maintenance, disturbing the normal operation. This paper presents a system approach to the fault finding, aiming its use in real-time applications. We started with a thorough review of the available features, followed by a consistent hyperparameters optimization across all different techniques, ensuring a comparable baseline. Finally, the results were compared according to a defined evaluation and performance criteria, using a) metrics such as mean square error and R-squared to determine how well the model fitted the dataset, and b) execution times for their fit and predict methods for different training and test sizes, to anticipate their performance on real-time applications. All models presented a very good result to predict the output state of the system, but the stacked models outperformed the remaining ones. The proposed framework has been tested and validated on a real application case.
引用
收藏
页码:696 / 703
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Ahmad Kamal Mohd N., 2021, SENSORS-BASEL, V21, P8020
  • [2] Ahsan M, 2016, INT SPR SEM ELECT TE, P279, DOI 10.1109/ISSE.2016.7563205
  • [3] Practical options for selecting data-driven or physics-based prognostics algorithms with reviews
    An, Dawn
    Kim, Nam H.
    Choi, Joo-Ho
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2015, 133 : 223 - 236
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2017, IEEE STD 16092A 2017, P1, DOI [10.1109/IEEESTD.2017.8055462, DOI 10.1109/IEEESTD.2017.8055462]
  • [5] A survey of cross-validation procedures for model selection
    Arlot, Sylvain
    Celisse, Alain
    [J]. STATISTICS SURVEYS, 2010, 4 : 40 - 79
  • [6] Atamuradov V., 2017, International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, V8, P1, DOI [10.36001/ijphm.2017.v8i3.2667, DOI 10.36001/IJPHM.2017.V8I3.2667]
  • [7] Reconciling modern machine-learning practice and the classical bias-variance trade-off
    Belkin, Mikhail
    Hsu, Daniel
    Ma, Siyuan
    Mandal, Soumik
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2019, 116 (32) : 15849 - 15854
  • [8] Bergstra J., 2013, PMLR, V28, P115, DOI 10.5555/3042817.3042832
  • [9] Bergstra J., 2011, P 2011 ANN C NEURAL, V24, DOI DOI 10.5555/2986459.2986743
  • [10] Bergstra J, 2012, J MACH LEARN RES, V13, P281