Soil compaction and controlled traffic considerations in Australian cotton-farming systems

被引:52
|
作者
Antille, Diogenes L. [1 ]
Bennett, John McL. [1 ]
Jensen, Troy A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ So Queensland, Natl Ctr Engn Agr, Bldg P9,West St, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
来源
CROP & PASTURE SCIENCE | 2016年 / 67卷 / 01期
关键词
axle load; cotton-harvesting technology; random traffic; sustainable cotton; traffic intensity; yield penalty; INDUCED SUBSOIL COMPACTION; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; PORE-SIZE DISTRIBUTION; HIGH AXLE LOADS; GLYCINE-MAX L; IRRIGATED COTTON; CROP PRODUCTION; NO-TILL; AGRICULTURAL VEHICLES; MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES;
D O I
10.1071/CP15097
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
A literature review was conducted to collate best practice techniques for soil compaction management within cotton-farming systems in Australia. Universally negative effects of traffic-induced soil compaction on the whole-farm system and the wider environment include: (i) increased gap between attainable and potential yields, (ii) increased costs of energy and labour, (iii) reduced fertiliser-use efficiency, (iv) reduced water use efficiency (irrigation and rainfall), (v) increased tillage intensity. Knowledge gaps that merit research priority, and research strategies, are suggested. These include: (i) identifying wider impacts on farm economics to guide decision-making and development of decision support systems that capture the effects of compaction on fertiliser, water, and energy use efficiency; (ii) predicting risks at the field or subfield scale and implementing precision management of traffic compaction; (iii) canopy management at terminal stages of the crop cycle to manipulate soil-moisture deficits before crop harvest, thereby optimising trafficability for harvesting equipment; (iv) the role of controlled traffic farming (CTF) in mitigating greenhouse gas emissions and loss of soil organic carbon, and in enhancing fertiliser and water-use efficiencies; (v) recent developments in tyre technology, such as low ground-pressure tyres, require investigation to assess their cost-effectiveness compared with other available options; and (vi) catchment-scale modelling incorporating changes in arable land-use, such as increased area under CTF coupled with no-or minimum-tillage, and variable rate technology is suggested. Such modelling should assess the potential of CTF and allied technologies to reduce sediment and nutrient losses, and improve water quality in intensively managed arable catchments. Resources must be efficiently managed within increasingly sophisticated farming systems to enable long-term economic viability of cotton production. Agronomic and environmental performance of cotton farming systems could be improved with a few changes, and possibly, at a reasonable cost. Key to managing soil compaction appears to be encouraging increased adoption of CTF. This process may benefit from financial support to growers, such as agri-environmental stewardships, and it would be assisted by product customisation from machinery manufacturers.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 28
页数:28
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Controlled traffic farming: an approach to minimize soil compaction and environmental impact on vegetable and other crops
    Shubha, Kumari
    Singh, Nongmaithem Raju
    Mukherjee, Anirban
    Maity, Aniruddha
    Dubey, Rachana
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2020, 119 (11): : 1760 - 1766
  • [2] Soil biology in Australian farming systems
    Murphy, DV
    Kirkegaard, JA
    Mele, PM
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 2006, 44 (04): : I - I
  • [3] CONTROLLED TRAFFIC FARMING SYSTEMS IN THE NETHERLANDS
    LAMERS, JG
    PERDOK, UD
    LUMKES, LM
    KLOOSTER, JJ
    SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 1986, 8 (1-4): : 65 - 76
  • [4] Effects of Tractor and Soil Parameters on the Depth of the Permanent Traffic Lanes in Controlled Traffic Farming Systems
    Bulgakov, Volodymyr
    Pascuzzi, Simone
    Nadykto, Volodymyr
    Adamchuk, Valerii
    Kaminskiy, Viktor
    Kyurchev, Volodymyr
    Santoro, Francesco
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (13):
  • [5] Controlled traffic farming restores soil structure
    McHugh, A. D.
    Tullberg, J. N.
    Freebairn, D. M.
    SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2009, 104 (01): : 164 - 172
  • [6] The whole-farm benefits of controlled traffic farming: An Australian appraisal
    Kingwell, Ross
    Fuchsbichler, Amy
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2011, 104 (07) : 513 - 521
  • [7] Reduced tillage systems for irrigated cotton: Is soil compaction a concern?
    Coates, WE
    APPLIED ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE, 2001, 17 (03) : 273 - 279
  • [8] UTILIZATION OF GPS GUIDANCE SYSTEMS IN CONTROLLED TRAFFIC FARMING
    Masek, Jiri
    Kroulik, Milan
    Novak, Petr
    12TH INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE ENGINEERING FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT, 2013, : 10 - 14
  • [9] Controlled traffic farming maintains soil physical functionality in sugarcane fields
    da Luz, Felipe Bonini
    Gonzaga, Leandro Carolino
    Castioni, Guilherme Adalberto Ferreira
    de Lima, Renato Paiva
    Carvalho, Joao Luis Nunes
    Cherubin, Mauricio Roberto
    GEODERMA, 2023, 432
  • [10] Controlled traffic farming effects on soil emissions of nitrous oxide and methane
    Tullberg, Jeff
    Antille, Diogenes L.
    Bluett, Chris
    Eberhard, Jochen
    Scheer, Clemens
    SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2018, 176 : 18 - 25