Has hosting on science direct improved the visibility of Latin American scholarly journals? A preliminary analysis of data quality

被引:9
作者
Ainsworth, Shirley [1 ]
Russell, Jane M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Biotecnol, Cuernavaca 62250, Morelos, Mexico
[2] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Energias Renovables, Temixco 62580, Morelos, Mexico
关键词
Open access journals; Database errors; Journal visibility; Scopus; Web of Science; SciELO Citation Index; GOOGLE SCHOLAR; OMITTED CITATIONS; BIBLIOMETRIC STATISTICS; SCOPUS; WEB; DATABASES; ERRORS; CLASSIFICATION; ERRORS/HORRORS; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-018-2725-7
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Latin American regional journals have adopted measures to increase both their quality and visibility, among which figures the promotion of their inclusion in international databases such as Scopus and Web of Science. An increasing number have recently taken advantage of the support and hosting services offered by Elsevier on the Science Direct (SD) platform, with the expectation of achieving this goal. The present study takes a preliminary look at the tendencies in the coverage in these databases of a sample of open access Latin American journals hosted on SD in June 2016 and their metadata, to typify the most common errors which can affect the use of performance indicators in individual and institutional evaluations and the integration of authors into scholarly reputation systems. A significant level of these errors was found relating to such aspects as journal coverage, duplicate records, reference data and links to full text, in addition to conventions concerning author names and titles that adversely affect retrieval of articles and the correct assignation of author credit and of citations, suggesting that present strategies have yet to deliver the expected results.
引用
收藏
页码:1463 / 1484
页数:22
相关论文
共 44 条
[21]   Accuracy and Completeness of Publication and Citation Records in the Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar: A Case Study for the Computation of h Indices in Psychology [J].
Garcia-Perez, Miguel A. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 61 (10) :2070-2085
[22]   Metadata mega mess in Google Scholar [J].
Jacso, Peter .
ONLINE INFORMATION REVIEW, 2010, 34 (01) :175-191
[23]   Call for caution in the use of bibliometric data [J].
Krauskopf, Erwin .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 68 (08) :2029-2032
[24]   Scientists' referencing (mis)behavior revealed by the dissemination network of referencing errors [J].
Liang, Liming ;
Zhong, Zhen ;
Rousseau, Ronald .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2014, 101 (03) :1973-1986
[25]   A response to "The museum of errors/horrors in Scopus" by Franceschini et al. [J].
Meester, Wim J. N. ;
Colledge, Lisa ;
Dyas, Elizabeth E. .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2016, 10 (02) :569-570
[26]   Is there science beyond English? Initiatives to increase the quality and visibility of non-English publications might help to break down language barriers in scientific communication [J].
Meneghini, Rogerio ;
Packer, Abel L. .
EMBO REPORTS, 2007, 8 (02) :112-116
[27]   International versus national oriented Brazilian scientific journals. A scientometric analysis based on SciELO and JCR-ISI databases [J].
Meneghini, Rogerio ;
Mugnaini, Rogerio ;
Packer, Abel L. .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2006, 69 (03) :529-538
[28]  
Miguel Sandra, 2015, Inf. cult. soc., P59
[29]   A new methodology for comparing Google Scholar and Scopus [J].
Moed, Henk F. ;
Bar-Ilan, Judit ;
Halevi, Gali .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2016, 10 (02) :533-551
[30]   The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis [J].
Mongeon, Philippe ;
Paul-Hus, Adele .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2016, 106 (01) :213-228