A panel quantile approach to attrition bias in Big Data: Evidence from a randomized experiment

被引:7
作者
Harding, Matthew [1 ,2 ]
Lamarche, Carlos [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Econ, 3207 Social Sci Plaza B, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Stat, 3207 Social Sci Plaza B, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[3] Univ Kentucky, Dept Econ, 223G Gatton Coll Business & Econ, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
关键词
Attrition; Big Data; Quantile regression; Individual effects; Time-of-Day pricing; REGRESSION-MODELS; SAMPLE SELECTION; INFERENCE; ASYMPTOTICS; ESTIMATORS; IMPUTATION; RESPOND; AVERAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jeconom.2018.12.006
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper introduces a quantile regression estimator for panel data models with individual heterogeneity and attrition. The method is motivated by the fact that attrition bias is often encountered in Big Data applications. For example, many users sign-up for the latest program but few remain active users several months later, making the evaluation of such interventions inherently very challenging. Building on earlier work by Hausman and Wise (1979), we provide a simple identification strategy that leads to a two-step estimation procedure. In the first step, the coefficients of interest in the selection equation are consistently estimated using parametric or nonparametric methods. In the second step, standard panel quantile methods are employed on a subset of weighted observations. The estimator is computationally easy to implement in Big Data applications with a large number of subjects. We investigate the conditions under which the parameter estimator is asymptotically Gaussian and we carry out a series of Monte Carlo simulations to investigate the finite sample properties of the estimator. Lastly, using a simulation exercise, we apply the method to the evaluation of a recent Time-of-Day electricity pricing experiment inspired by the work of Aigner and Hausman (1980). (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 82
页数:22
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Instrumental variables estimates of the effect of subsidized training on the quantiles of trainee earnings [J].
Abadie, A ;
Angrist, J ;
Imbens, G .
ECONOMETRICA, 2002, 70 (01) :91-117
[2]   The Effects of Birth Inputs on Birthweight: Evidence From Quantile Estimation on Panel Data [J].
Abrevaya, Jason ;
Dahl, Christian M. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2008, 26 (04) :379-397
[3]   CORRECTING FOR TRUNCATION BIAS IN THE ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTS IN TIME-OF-DAY PRICING OF ELECTRICITY [J].
AIGNER, DJ ;
HAUSMAN, JA .
BELL JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1980, 11 (01) :131-142
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, A companion to econometric analysis of panel data
[5]  
Babcock Brian, 2002, PODS, P1, DOI DOI 10.1145/543613.543615
[6]   l1-PENALIZED QUANTILE REGRESSION IN HIGH-DIMENSIONAL SPARSE MODELS [J].
Belloni, Alexandre ;
Chernozhukov, Victor .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 2011, 39 (01) :82-130
[7]   Inference in panel data models under attrition caused by unobservables [J].
Bhattacharya, Debopam .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2008, 144 (02) :430-446
[8]   A simple approach to quantile regression for panel data [J].
Canay, Ivan A. .
ECONOMETRICS JOURNAL, 2011, 14 (03) :368-386
[9]   Efficient Quantile Regression Analysis With Missing Observations [J].
Chen, Xuerong ;
Wan, Alan T. K. ;
Zhou, Yong .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 110 (510) :723-741
[10]   Three-step censored quantile regression and extramarital affairs [J].
Chernozhukov, V ;
Hong, H .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 97 (459) :872-882