QTL analyses of complex traits with cross validation, bootstrapping and other biometric methods

被引:43
作者
Melchinger, AE [1 ]
Utz, HF
Schön, GC
机构
[1] Univ Hohenheim, Inst Plant Breeding Seed Sci & Populat Genet, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany
[2] Univ Hohenheim, State Plant Breeding Inst, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
Bayesian methods; bootstrapping; cross validation; QTL mapping;
D O I
10.1023/B:EUPH.0000040498.48379.68
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
With the development of molecular markers, dissection of complex quantitative traits by mapping the underlying genetic factors has become a major research area in plant breeding. Here, we report results from a vast QTL mapping experiment in maize with testcrosses of N = 976 F-4:5 lines evaluated in E = 16 environments. Although the number of detected QTL confirmed the infinitesimal model of quantitative genetics ( e. g., 30 QTL detected with LOD greater than or equal to 2.5 for plant height, explaining p = 61% of the genetic variance), cross validation ( CV) still revealed an upward bias of about 10% in p. With smaller values of N ( 122, 244, 488) and E ( 2, 4), the number of detected QTL decreased, but the estimates of p remained almost the same due to a tremendous increase in the bias. This illustrates that QTL effects obtained from smaller sample sizes are usually highly inflated, leading to an overly optimistic assessment of the prospects of MAS. Moreover, inferences about the genetic architecture ( number of QTL and their effects) of complex traits cannot be achieved reliably with smaller sample sizes. Based on simulations, we conclude that CV and one method of bootstrapping (BS) performed well with regard to yielding realistic estimates of p. In addition, we briefly review progress in new biometric methods and approaches to QTL mapping in plants including Bayesian methods that show great promise to overcome the present limitations of QTL mapping.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Bias in estimates of quantitative-trait-locus effect in genome scans: Demonstration of the phenomenon and a method-of-moments procedure for reducing bias [J].
Allison, DB ;
Fernandez, JR ;
Heo, M ;
Zhu, SK ;
Etzel, C ;
Beasley, TM ;
Amos, CI .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2002, 70 (03) :575-585
[2]   Present and future of quantitative trait locus analysis in plant breeding [J].
Asíns, MJ .
PLANT BREEDING, 2002, 121 (04) :281-291
[3]  
Ball RD, 2001, GENETICS, V159, P1351
[4]  
Beavis William D., 1998, P145
[5]  
Bennewitz J, 2002, GENETICS, V160, P1673
[6]  
Boer MP, 2002, GENETICS, V162, P951
[7]   SUBMODEL SELECTION AND EVALUATION IN REGRESSION - THE X-RANDOM CASE [J].
BREIMAN, L ;
SPECTOR, P .
INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL REVIEW, 1992, 60 (03) :291-319
[8]   Estimation of the contribution of quantitative trait loci (QTL) to the variance of a quantitative trait by means of genetic markers [J].
Charcosset, A ;
Gallais, A .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1996, 93 (08) :1193-1201
[9]  
Doerge RW, 1996, GENETICS, V142, P285
[10]   Mapping and analysis of quantitative trait loci in experimental populations [J].
Doerge, RW .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2002, 3 (01) :43-52