Does the rise of STEM education mean the demise of sustainability education?

被引:25
作者
Smith, Caroline [1 ,2 ]
Watson, Jane [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, Burnie, Tas, Australia
[2] Univ Tasmania, Hobart, Tas, Australia
关键词
critical reflection; education; neoliberalism; STEM; sustainability; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1017/aee.2018.51
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In this article, we outline the key principles of education for sustainability (EfS) that enable us to question the enthusiastic and uncritical promotion of STEM (science, mathematics, engineering and technology) and its offshoot, STEM education, as key contributors to an environmentally sustainable future. We examine the framing of STEM and STEM education as situated in an unproblematised, neoliberal growthist paradigm, in contrast to the more critical ecological paradigm of EfS. We conclude that STEM, and hence STEM education, need to include critical reflection and futures perspectives if they are to align themselves with a flourishing economic, social and environmental future. We provide examples for the classroom that illustrate our contention.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Abram David., 1997, SPELL SENSUOUS PERCE
[2]  
Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering, 2010, REN EN ATSE STELR ST
[3]  
Academy of Technological Sciences and Engineering, 2016, STELR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Education for Sustainable Development
[5]  
[Anonymous], EMERGING APPROACHES
[6]  
Asafu-Adjaye J., 2015, ECOMODERNIST MANIFES
[7]  
Australasian Science Education Research Association (ASERA), 2017, PROF STEM ED
[8]  
Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA), 2017, CROSS CURR PRIOR SUS
[9]  
Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA), 2016, ACARA STEM CONN PROJ
[10]  
Australian Education for Sustainability Alliance (AESA), 2015, GETT START SUST SCH