Reduction of foot-and-mouth disease virus transmission in cattle vaccinated one or two weeks before challenge using a commercial polyvalent vaccine

被引:2
作者
Duffy, Sergio [1 ]
Fondevila, Norberto [2 ]
Galdo Novo, Sabrina [3 ]
Aznar, Maria [1 ]
Garro, Carlos [1 ]
Smitsaart, Eliana [4 ]
Monti, Gustavo [5 ]
机构
[1] CICVyA INTA Castelar, Inst Patobiol, RA-1686 Hurlingham, Argentina
[2] CICVyA INTA Castelar, Inst Virol, RA-1686 Hurlingham, Argentina
[3] Serv Nacl Sanidad & Calidad Agroalimentaria SENAS, Talcahuano 1660, RA-1640 San Isidro, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[4] Biogenesis Bago SA, Ruta Panamer Km 38-5, RA-1619 Garin, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[5] Univ Austral Chile, Fac Ciencias Vet, Independencia 641, Valdivia, Chile
关键词
Foot-and-mouth disease; Vaccination; Cattle; Virus transmission; FMD VACCINATION; PROTECTION; QUANTIFICATION; ARGENTINA; OUTBREAK; IMMUNITY; ASSAY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvacx.2020.100063
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Immediate vaccination of the most susceptible and epidemiological relevant animals is a crucial part of control measures that facilitate virus elimination in case of entry of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD). The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of cattle vaccination 7 and 14 days prior challenge using a vaccine commonly applied in systematic vaccination campaigns against transmission of FMD virus (FMDV). Transmission of FMDV was investigated in three groups of ten cattle each: one non-vaccinated group and two groups that were either vaccinated 7 days (-7/vaccinated group) or 14 days (-14/vaccinated group) before intranasal (IN) inoculation. Five cattle heads from each group were inoculated using the IN-route with the A/Argentina/2001 FMDV strain, while the remaining five cattle heads of each group were contact-exposed to inoculated cattle. Clinical signs were recorded; virus isolation and genome detection by RT-PCR were carried out on oesophageal-pharyngeal fluid (OPF) and blood. Neutralizing antibody titers and antibodies against non-structural proteins (NSP) of FMDV were also determined. Results suggest that the experimental design, virus challenge dose, and virus infectivity were appropriate and that the virus had been transmitted to naive calves. Under the outlined experimental conditions, vaccination 7 and 14 days prior to challenge induced full clinical protection against virus inoculation. Moreover, -7/ or -14/vaccinated calves that had been contact-exposed to -7/ or -14/vaccinated IN-challenged calves, did not become infected. Consequently, no virus transmission occurred from vaccinated and subsequently infected calves to cohabitating vaccinated calves (R = 0). According to our results, early vaccination during an outbreak is effective as virus transmission can be significantly reduced using a vaccine commercially available, routinely applied in systematic vaccination campaigns. (C) 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Factors Associated With Within-Herd Transmission of Serotype A Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus in Cattle, During the 2001 Outbreak in Argentina: A Protective Effect of Vaccination [J].
Brito, B. P. ;
Perez, A. M. ;
Cosentino, B. ;
Rodriguez, L. L. ;
Koenig, G. A. .
TRANSBOUNDARY AND EMERGING DISEASES, 2011, 58 (05) :387-393
[2]   Comparative evaluation of six ELISAs for the detection of antibodies to the non-structural proteins of foot-and-mouth disease virus [J].
Brocchi, E. ;
Bergmann, I. E. ;
Dekker, A. ;
Paton, D. J. ;
Sammin, D. J. ;
Greiner, M. ;
Grazioli, S. ;
De Simone, F. ;
Yadin, H. ;
Haas, B. ;
Bulut, N. ;
Malirat, V. ;
Neitzert, E. ;
Goris, N. ;
Parida, S. ;
Sorensen, K. ;
De Clercq, K. .
VACCINE, 2006, 24 (47-48) :6966-6979
[3]   Use of a portable real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay for rapid detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus [J].
Callahan, JD ;
Brown, F ;
Csorio, FA ;
Sur, JH ;
Kramer, E ;
Long, GW ;
Lubroth, J ;
Ellis, SJ ;
Shoulars, KS ;
Gaffney, KL ;
Rock, DL ;
Nelson, WM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN VETERINARY MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 220 (11) :1636-1642
[4]  
CFIA, 2020, VET BIOL LIC CAN CTR
[5]   Protection against direct-contact challenge following emergency FMD vaccination of cattle and the effect on virus excretion from the oropharynx [J].
Cox, SJ ;
Voyce, C ;
Parida, S ;
Reid, SM ;
Hamblin, PA ;
Paton, DJ ;
Barnett, PV .
VACCINE, 2005, 23 (09) :1106-1113
[6]   Herd immunity after vaccination: how to quantify it and how to use it to halt disease [J].
De Jong, MCM ;
Bouma, A .
VACCINE, 2001, 19 (17-19) :2722-2728
[7]   Quantification of transmission of foot-and-mouth disease virus caused by an environment contaminated with secretions and excretions from infected calves [J].
de Rueda, Carla Bravo ;
de Jong, Mart C. M. ;
Eble, Phaedra L. ;
Dekker, Aldo .
VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2015, 46
[8]   EXPERIMENTAL QUANTIFICATION OF VACCINE-INDUCED REDUCTION IN VIRUS TRANSMISSION [J].
DEJONG, MCM ;
KIMMAN, TG .
VACCINE, 1994, 12 (08) :761-766
[9]   EMERGENCY VACCINATION AGAINST FOOT-AND-MOUTH-DISEASE - RATE OF DEVELOPMENT OF IMMUNITY AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR THE CARRIER STATE [J].
DOEL, TR ;
WILLIAMS, L ;
BARNETT, PV .
VACCINE, 1994, 12 (07) :592-600
[10]   Vaccination of pigs two weeks before infection significantly reduces transmission of foot-and-mouth disease virus [J].
Eblé, PL ;
Bouma, A ;
de Bruin, MGM ;
van Hemert-Kluitenberg, F ;
van Oirschot, J ;
Dekker, A .
VACCINE, 2004, 22 (11-12) :1372-1378