Motivations and experiences in managing rare semi-natural biotopes: A case from Finland

被引:18
作者
Birge, Traci [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Herzon, Irina [3 ]
机构
[1] Abo Akad Univ, Aronia Res & Dev Inst, FI-10600 Ekenas, Finland
[2] Novia Univ Appl Sci, FI-10600 Ekenas, Finland
[3] Univ Helsinki, Dept Agr Sci, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
关键词
Semi-natural meadows; Traditional rural biotopes; Cultural landscape; High nature value farmland; Agri-environmental schemes; Farmer conservation; AGRI-ENVIRONMENT SCHEMES; FARMER PARTICIPATION; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; VALUES; AGRICULTURE; PERCEPTIONS; AREAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.05.004
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Traditional rural biotopes (TRBs) are semi-natural farmland habitats of high nature value formed through traditional agricultural activities, such as grazing and fodder collection. The aims of this study were to 1) understand manager motivations for managing TRBs and their attitudes toward TRB conservation and 2) determine whether TRB managers differ in attitude, motivation for management, experiences or area under management depending on whether their managed TRBs are integrated or separate from their farming systems. Farmers and landowners (N=27) managing TRBs in coastal Finland were interviewed. In addition to quantitative analysis, responses were mapped with DebateGraph for inductive analysis to discern patterns amongst the two groups and to explore a series of questions related to motivations. Although area under management and farming strategy varied amongst managers, they all had a positive view toward the existential value of TRBs. A small group of "TRB entrepreneurs", whose farming strategy was based on grazing primarily rented TRBs was identified. Their farming income was dependent upon direct sale of meat and participation in agri-environmental scheme for TRB management. Desire for open landscape was the primary motivation for managing TRBs and strongly outweighed extrinsic values such as fodder production and AES. Higher TRB: farm ratio was associated with more positive attitude toward TRBs and TRB conservation. No difference was found in motivation for management between the two farmer groups. Although motivations were similar, improved and tailored extension services for TRB managers could promote their conservation management. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 137
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Aakkula J., 2010, Maatalouden ymparistotuen vaikuttavuuden seurantatutkimus (MYTVAS 3)-Valiraportti. Follow-up study on the impacts of agrienvironment measures (MYTVAS 3)-Mid-term report
[2]   Farmers and nature conservation: What is known about attitudes, context factors and actions affecting conservation? [J].
Ahnstrom, Johan ;
Hockert, Jenny ;
Bergea, Hanna L. ;
Francis, Charles A. ;
Skelton, Peter ;
Hallgren, Lars .
RENEWABLE AGRICULTURE AND FOOD SYSTEMS, 2009, 24 (01) :38-47
[3]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, High nature value farmland-Characteristics, trends and policy challenges
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, EEA Technical report No 13/2010
[6]  
ASEAN Centre for Biodiversity, 2010, TURTL ISL HER PROT A
[7]  
Beaufoy G., 2009, PREPARED EUROPEAN EV
[8]   Using social-psychology models to understand farmers' conservation behaviour [J].
Beedell, J ;
Rehman, T .
JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2000, 16 (01) :117-127
[9]   Explaining farmers' conservation behaviour: Why do farmers behave the way they do? [J].
Beedell, JDC ;
Rehman, T .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1999, 57 (03) :165-176
[10]   NEW IDEAS FOR OLD LANDSCAPES: USING A SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL APPROACH FOR CONSERVATION OF TRADITIONAL RURAL BIOTOPES - A CASE STUDY FROM FINLAND [J].
Birge, Traci ;
Fred, Marianne .
EUROPEAN COUNTRYSIDE, 2011, 3 (02) :133-152