Change in Abstract Bipolar Argumentation Systems

被引：5
作者：
Cayrol, Claudette [1 ]
Lagasquie-Schiex, Marie-Christine [1 ]
机构：
[1] IRIT UPS, Toulouse, France
来源：
SCALABLE UNCERTAINTY MANAGEMENT (SUM 2015) | 2015年 / 9310卷
关键词：
Dynamics of bipolar Argumentation; Deductive support; ACCEPTABILITY;
D O I：
10.1007/978-3-319-23540-0_21
中图分类号：
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号：
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要：
An argumentation system can undergo changes (addition or removal of arguments/interactions), particularly in multiagent systems. In this paper, we are interested in dynamics of abstract bipolar argumentation systems, i.e. argumentation systems using two kinds of interaction: attacks and supports. We propose change characterizations that use and extend previous results defined in the case of Dung abstract argumentation systems.
引用
收藏
页码：314 / 329
页数：16
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks [J].
Amgoud, L. ;
Cayrol, C. ;
Lagasquie-Schiex, M. C. ;
Livet, P. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2008, 23 (10) :1062-1093
[2]   A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments [J].
Amgoud, L ;
Cayrol, C .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICS AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2002, 34 (1-3) :197-215
[3]   Modelling dialogues using argumentation [J].
Amgoud, L ;
Maudet, N ;
Parsons, S .
FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIAGENT SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, :31-38
[4]   A formal analysis of the role of argumentation in negotiation dialogues [J].
Amgoud, Leila ;
Vesic, Srdjan .
JOURNAL OF LOGIC AND COMPUTATION, 2012, 22 (05) :957-978
[5]   On the Input/Output behavior of argumentation frameworks [J].
Baroni, Pietro ;
Boella, Guido ;
Cerutti, Federico ;
Giacomin, Massimiliano ;
van der Torre, Leendert ;
Villata, Serena .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2014, 217 :144-197
[6]   On topology-related properties of abstract argumentation- semantics. A correction and extension to Dynamics of argumentation systems: A division-based method [J].
Baroni, Pietro ;
Giacomin, Massimiliano ;
Liao, Beishui .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2014, 212 :104-115
[7]   An introduction to argumentation semantics [J].
Baroni, Pietro ;
Caminada, Martin ;
Giacomin, Massimiliano .
KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING REVIEW, 2011, 26 (04) :365-410
[8]   What Does it Take to Enforce an Argument? Minimal Change in Abstract Argumentation [J].
Baumann, Ringo .
20TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (ECAI 2012), 2012, 242 :127-132
[9]  
Bisquert P., 2013, Trends in Belief Revision and Argumentation Dynamics, V48, P75
[10]  
Booth R, 2013, LECT NOTES ARTIF INT, V8078, P148, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-40381-1_12
123