A rapid response magnitude scale for timely assessment of the high frequency seismic radiation

被引:14
作者
Picozzi, M. [1 ]
Bindi, D. [2 ]
Spallarossa, D. [3 ]
Di Giacomo, D. [4 ]
Zollo, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
[2] Helmholtz Ctr Potsdam, GFZ German Res Ctr Geosci, Potsdam, Germany
[3] Univ Genoa, Genoa, Italy
[4] Int Seismol Ctr ISC, Thatcham, England
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
GROUND-MOTION PREDICTION; STRESS-DROP; APPARENT STRESS; ENERGY-RELEASE; VARIABILITY; EARTHQUAKES; DEPENDENCE; HAZARD; INTENSITY; SEQUENCE;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-018-26938-9
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In this work the scaling of seismic moment (M-0) and radiated energy (E-r) is investigated for almost 800 earthquakes of the 2016-17 Amatrice-Norcia sequences in Italy, ranging in moment magnitude (M-w) from 2.5 to 6.5. The analysis of the M-0-to-E-r scaling highlights a breaking of the source self-similarity, with higher stress drops for larger events. Our results show the limitation of using M-0, and in turn M-w, to capture the variability of the high frequency ground motion. Since the observed seismicity does not agree with the assumptions on stress drop in the definition of M-w, we exploit the availability of both E-r and M-0 to modify the definition of M-w and introduce a rapid response magnitude (M-r), which accounts for the dynamic properties of rupture. The new M-r scale allows us to improve the prediction of the earthquake shaking potential, as shown by the reduction of the between-event residuals computed for the peak ground velocity. The procedure we propose is therefore a significant step towards a quick assessment of earthquakes damage potential and timely implementation of emergency plans.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 54 条
[21]   GLOBAL PATTERNS OF RADIATED SEISMIC ENERGY AND APPARENT STRESS [J].
CHOY, GL ;
BOATWRIGHT, JL .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 1995, 100 (B9) :18205-18228
[22]   Apparent stress, fault maturity and seismic hazard for normal-fault earthquakes at subduction zones [J].
Choy, GL ;
Kirby, SH .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 159 (03) :991-1012
[23]   What is Sigma of the Stress Drop? [J].
Cotton, Fabrice ;
Archuleta, Ralph ;
Causse, Mathieu .
SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2013, 84 (01) :42-48
[24]   A Local Magnitude Scale for Crustal Earthquakes in Italy [J].
Di Bona, Massimo .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2016, 106 (01) :242-258
[25]  
Di Giacomo D, 2010, GEOPHYS J INT, V180, P361, DOI [10.1111/j.1365-246X.2009.04416.x, 10.1111/J.1365-246X.2009.04416.X]
[26]  
Dreger D.S., 2003, INT HDB EARTHQUAKE E, V81B, P1627, DOI [10.1016/S0074-6142(03)80290-5, DOI 10.1016/S0074-6142(03)80290-5]
[27]   1977 RIETZ LECTURE - BOOTSTRAP METHODS - ANOTHER LOOK AT THE JACKKNIFE [J].
EFRON, B .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1979, 7 (01) :1-26
[28]   Performance of Earthquake Early Warning Systems during the 2016-2017 Mw 5-6.5 Central Italy Sequence [J].
Festa, Gaetano ;
Picozzi, Matteo ;
Caruso, Alessandro ;
Colombelli, Simona ;
Cattaneo, Marco ;
Chiaraluce, Lauro ;
Elia, Luca ;
Martino, Claudio ;
Marzorati, Simone ;
Supino, Mariano ;
Zollo, Aldo .
SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 89 (01) :1-12
[29]   Performance test of an automated moment tensor determination system for the future "Tokai" earthquake [J].
Fukuyama, E ;
Dreger, DS .
EARTH PLANETS AND SPACE, 2000, 52 (06) :383-392
[30]  
Gutenberg B., 1956, Ann Geofis, V9, P1, DOI [DOI 10.4401/AG-5590, DOI 10.1038/176795A0]