Salvage of the failed implant-based breast reconstruction using the Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap: A single centre experience with tertiary breast reconstruction

被引:9
作者
Holmes, Will J. M. [1 ]
Quinn, Marcus [2 ]
Emam, Ahmed T. [2 ]
Ali, Stephen R. [3 ]
Prousskaia, Elena [2 ]
Wilson, Sherif M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Mid Yorkshire Hosp Fdn Trust, Pinderfields Hosp, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Aberford Rd, Wakefield WF1 4DG, England
[2] North Bristol NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Southmead Rd, Bristol BS10 5NB, Avon, England
[3] Norfolk & Norwich Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Colney Lane, Norwich NR4 7UY, Norfolk, England
关键词
Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap; DIEP; Tertiary; Breast; Reconstruction; Salvage; SATISFACTION; PREDICTORS; INFECTION; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2019.03.003
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The longevity and durability of implant-based reconstruction is limited and many patients who develop complications seek alternative reconstruction. Recent studies have shown tertiary reconstruction with autologous tissue to be safe in the short term. But no study has looked in-depth at the motivation for seeking referral and its long-term outcome. Methods: This was a retrospective study using patient case-notes and a prospectively-collated database. One hundred and fifteen patients underwent tertiary breast reconstruction with a Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) flap between 1998 and 2016. Results: Mean age was 49 (23-67). The predominant initial reconstruction was expander (71%). Twenty nine percent received a definitive reconstruction (implant with acellular dermal matrix or pedicled latissimus dorsi). The proportion of patients who received post-mastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) to their implant was 72%. Thirty four percent underwent surgical salvage prior to referral for autologous tissue and this was significantly higher in the group that did not receive PMRT (29% vs 40, p = 0.04). Predominant motivation for autologous reconstruction was poor cosmesis (62%) and/or grade III/IV capsular contracture (27%). Mean time from implant to DIEP was 4 years 5 months. Ten percent had complications requiring re-operation. Flap loss was 0.7%. Fifty five percent required an additional ipsilateral procedure and 47% re-quired symmetrization. Median follow-up was 20-months (6-months to 7-years). Conclusions: We present the largest UK series of tertiary breast reconstruction. Tertiary re-construction is safe with a surgical outcome comparable to delayed autologous reconstruction. Patients with implant complications often had multiple failed attempts at salvage prior to re-ferral. We advocate careful consideration of implants in the setting of PMRT and early referral for autologous tissue once complications become apparent. (C) 2019 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1075 / 1083
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], ONC BREAST REC GUID
[2]   Acellular Human Dermis Implantation in 153 Immediate Two-Stage Tissue Expander Breast Reconstructions: Determining the Incidence and Significant Predictors of Complications [J].
Antony, Anuja K. ;
McCarthy, Colleen M. ;
Cordeiro, Peter G. ;
Mehrara, Babak J. ;
Pusic, Andrea L. ;
Teo, Esther H. ;
Arriaga, Alexander F. ;
Disa, Joseph J. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 125 (06) :1606-1614
[3]  
Borrelli C, 2016, 2 PUBL HLTH ENGL
[4]   Reconstruction of the Irradiated Breast: A National Claims-Based Assessment of Postoperative Morbidity [J].
Chetta, Matthew D. ;
Aliu, Oluseyi ;
Zhong, Lin ;
Sears, Erika D. ;
Waljee, Jennifer F. ;
Chung, Kevin C. ;
Momoh, Adeyiza O. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2017, 139 (04) :783-792
[5]   Breast Implants and the Risk of Anaplastic Large-Cell Lymphoma in the Breast [J].
de Boer, Mintsje ;
van Leeuwen, Flora E. ;
Hauptmann, Michael ;
Overbeek, Lucy I. H. ;
de Boer, Jan Paul ;
Hijmering, Nathalie J. ;
Sernee, Arthur ;
Klazen, Caroline A. H. ;
Lobbes, Marc B. I. ;
van der Hulst, Rene R. W. J. ;
Rakhorst, Hinne A. ;
de Jong, Daphne .
JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2018, 4 (03) :335-341
[6]   Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy [J].
Elswick, Sarah M. ;
Harless, Christin A. ;
Bishop, Sarah N. ;
Schleck, Cathy D. ;
Mandrekar, Jay ;
Reusche, Ryan D. ;
Mutter, Robert W. ;
Boughey, Judy C. ;
Jacobson, Steven R. ;
Lemaine, Valerie .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2018, 142 (01) :1-12
[7]   Salvage (tertiary) breast reconstruction after implant failure [J].
Hamdi, Moustapha ;
Casaer, Bob ;
Andrades, Patricio ;
Thiessen, Filip ;
Dancey, Anne ;
D'Arpa, Salvatori ;
Van Landuyt, Koenraad .
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2011, 64 (03) :353-359
[8]   A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Complications Associated With Acellular Dermal Matrix-Assisted Breast Reconstruction [J].
Ho, Goretti ;
Nguyen, T. JoAnna ;
Shahabi, Ahva ;
Hwang, Brian H. ;
Chan, Linda S. ;
Wong, Alex K. .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2012, 68 (04) :346-356
[9]   Patient-Reported Aesthetic Satisfaction with Breast Reconstruction during the Long-Term Survivorship Period [J].
Hu, Emily S. ;
Pusic, Andrea L. ;
Waljee, Jennifer F. ;
Kuhn, Latoya ;
Hawley, Sarah T. ;
Wilkins, Edwin ;
Alderman, Amy K. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 124 (01) :1-8
[10]  
Jeevan R, 2010, 3 NHS INF CTR