Evaluating the usefulness of dynamic pollutant fate models for implementing the EU Water Framework Directive

被引:17
作者
Gevaert, Veerle [1 ]
Verdonck, Frederik [1 ]
Benedetti, Lorenzo [1 ]
De Keyser, Webbey [1 ]
De Baets, Bernard [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, BIOMATH, Dept Appl Math Biometr & Proc Control, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Univ Ghent, KERMIT, Dept Appl Math Biometr & Proc Control, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Dynamic modelling; Environmental Quality Standards (EQSs); Monitoring; Priority substances; River water quality; Water Framework Directive (WFD); RIVER; NONYLPHENOL; DEGRADATION; QUALITY; WASTE; BIODEGRADATION; 4-NONYLPHENOL; ALKYLPHENOLS; QUANTITY; PHENOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.02.046
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The European Water Framework Directive (WFD) aims at achieving a good ecological and chemical status of surface waters in river basins by 2015. The chemical status is considered good if the Environmental Quality Standards (EQSs) are met for all substances listed on the priority list and eight additional specific emerging substances. To check compliance with these standards, the WFD requires the establishment of monitoring programmes. The minimum measuring frequency for priority substances is currently set at once per month. This can result in non-representative sampling and increased probability of misinterpretation of the surface water quality status. To assist in the classification of the water body, the combined use of monitoring data and pollutant fate models is recommended. More specifically, dynamic models are suggested, as possible exceedance of the quality standards can be predicted by such models. In the presented work, four realistic scenarios are designed and discussed to illustrate the usefulness of dynamic pollutant fate models for implementing the WFD. They comprise a combination of two priority substances and two rivers, representative for Western Europe. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 35
页数:9
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   PARTITIONING OF ALKYLPHENOLS AND ALKYLPHENOL POLYETHOXYLATES BETWEEN WATER AND ORGANIC-SOLVENTS [J].
AHEL, M ;
GIGER, W .
CHEMOSPHERE, 1993, 26 (08) :1471-1478
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Technical Guidance Document on Risk Assessment Part II
[3]  
[Anonymous], EUR UN RISK ASS REP
[4]   The water framework directive and European water policy [J].
Barth, F ;
Fawell, J .
ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY, 2001, 50 (02) :103-105
[5]  
Blöch H, 2001, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V44, P1
[6]  
Boeije G, 1997, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V36, P251, DOI 10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00481-2
[7]   CHARACTERIZING THE QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF DOMESTIC WASTE-WATER INFLOWS [J].
BUTLER, D ;
FRIEDLER, E ;
GATT, K .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 31 (07) :13-24
[8]   The fate of xenobiotic organic compounds in wastewater treatment plants [J].
Byrns, G .
WATER RESEARCH, 2001, 35 (10) :2523-2533
[9]   Degradation of nonylphenol by anaerobic microorganisms from river sediment [J].
Chang, BV ;
Yu, CH ;
Yuan, SY .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2004, 55 (04) :493-500
[10]   THE EFFECTS OF NONYLPHENOL ON DAPHNIA-MAGNA [J].
COMBER, MHI ;
WILLIAMS, TD ;
STEWART, KM .
WATER RESEARCH, 1993, 27 (02) :273-276