Workflow description of additively manufactured clear silicone indexes for injected provisional restorations: A novel technique

被引:21
作者
Revilla-Leon, Marta [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Fountain, Joshua [4 ]
Piedra Cascon, Wenceslao [3 ,5 ]
Ozcan, Mutlu [6 ]
Zandinejad, Amirali [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Coll Dent, 3302 Gaston Ave,Room 713, Dallas, TX 75246 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Grad Prosthodont Program, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Revilla Res Ctr, Madrid, Spain
[4] Texas A&M Univ, Coll Dent, AEGD Program, Dallas, TX USA
[5] Univ Complutense Madrid, Esthet Dent, Madrid, Spain
[6] Univ Zurich, Dent Mat Unit, Ctr Dent & Oral Med, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
3D printing; additive manufacturing; computer-aided design; injected technique; provisional restoration; CONVENTIONAL IMPRESSIONS; INTRAORAL SCANNERS; FIXED PROSTHODONTICS; IMPLANT IMPRESSIONS; ACCURACY; RELIABILITY; PRECISION; VALIDITY; MODELS; POWDER;
D O I
10.1111/jerd.12464
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective The present article describes the digital workflow protocol for additive manufacturing (AM) of a clear silicone index to be used for an injected provisional restoration fabrication. Clinical considerations The incorporation of CAD software and AM technologies have allowed the integration of a new way to fabricate conventional diagnostic wax-ups and silicone indexes for preparing diagnostic mock ups, direct composite restorations, or provisional restorations. Although the conventional concept remains, the protocol differs. Conclusions This workflow provides a more efficient and accurate procedure with the reduction of time and cost compared to conventional technique. Clinical Significance The digital workflow protocol described for AM of a clear silicone index to be used for an injected provisional restoration fabrication is time and cost efficient compared to conventional procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 221
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners: A Systematic Review of Influencing Factors
    Abduo, Jaafar
    Elseyoufi, Mohamed
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2018, 26 (03) : 101 - 121
  • [2] Digital Versus Conventional Impressions in Fixed Prosthodontics: A Review
    Ahlholm, Pekka
    Sipila, Kirsi
    Vallittu, Pekka
    Jakonen, Minna
    Kotiranta, Ulla
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2018, 27 (01): : 35 - 41
  • [3] Al-Jubouri O., 2015, J Chem Pharm Res, V7, P10
  • [4] Effect of imaging powder and CAD/CAM stone types on the marginal gap of zirconia crowns
    Alghazzawi, Tariq F.
    Al-Samadani, Khalid H.
    Lemons, Jack
    Liu, Perng-Ru
    Essig, Milton E.
    Bartolucci, Alfred A.
    Janowski, Gregg M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 146 (02) : 111 - 120
  • [5] A comparison of the precision of three-dimensional images acquired by 2 digital intraoral scanners: effects of tooth irregularity and scanning direction
    Anh, Ji-won
    Park, Ji-Man
    Chun, Youn-Sic
    Kim, Miae
    Kim, Minji
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2016, 46 (01) : 3 - 12
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2009, ISOASTM5290015
  • [7] Validity and reliability of intraoral scanners compared to conventional gypsum models measurements: a systematic review
    Aragon, Monica L. C.
    Pontes, Luana F.
    Bichara, Livia M.
    Flores-Mir, Carlos
    Normando, David
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2016, 38 (04) : 429 - 434
  • [8] Evaluating the influence of ambient light on scanning trueness, precision, and time of intra oral scanner
    Arakida, Toshio
    Kanazawa, Manabu
    Iwaki, Maiko
    Suzuki, Tetsuya
    Minakuchi, Shunsuke
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH, 2018, 62 (03) : 324 - 329
  • [9] Chochlidakis KM, 2016, J PROSTHET DENT, V116, P184, DOI 10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.12.017
  • [10] Intra-arch dimensional measurement validity of laser-scanned digital dental models compared with the original plaster models: a systematic review
    De Luca Canto, G.
    Pacheco-Pereira, C.
    Lagravere, M. O.
    Flores-Mir, C.
    Major, P. W.
    [J]. ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2015, 18 (02) : 65 - 76