Assessment of the amino sugar-nitrogen test on Iowa soils: II. Field correlation and calibration

被引:3
作者
Barker, D. W. [1 ]
Sawyer, J. E. [1 ]
Al-Kaisi, M. M. [1 ]
Lundvall, J. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Agron, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj2006.0034
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
There has been growing interest in using the amino sugar-nitrogen test (ASNT) to improve N fertilization of corn (Zea mays L.). The ASNT is intended to measure the soil organic N fraction that contributes to plant available N. The objectives of this study were to correlate the ASNT to corn N response measures and calibrate the test to Iowa soils and climatic conditions. Soil samples were collected in the fall, early spring, and late spring at the 0- to 15-cm and 0- to 30-cm sample depths. No significant correlation could be found between the ASNT and relative leaf chlorophyll meter value, relative grain protein, relative grain yield, grain yield response to applied N, and economic optimum N rate (EONR). The ASNT was not able to differentiate sites that were responsive or nonresponsive to N fertilization and could not be calibrated to EONR. There were strong linear correlations between the ASNT and total soil N (TSN), hydrolyzable NH4-N, and hydrolyzable NH4 + amino sugar-N. The ASNT was not significantly correlated to hydrolyzable amino sugar-N. The soils tested in this study had large amounts of hydrolyzable NH4-N relative to hydrolyzable amino sugar-N, which may partially explain the poor results with the ASNT. Also, liberation of a constant proportion of TSN by the ASNT procedure explains the inability of the test to estimate a specific portion of soil N that contributes to plant available N. Based on the results of this work, the ASNT is not recommended in Iowa for estimating corn N responsiveness or adjusting N application rate.
引用
收藏
页码:1352 / 1358
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SSSA BOOK SER
[2]   Assessment of the amino sugar-nitrogen test on Iowa soils: I. Evaluation of soil sampling and corn management practices [J].
Barker, D. W. ;
Sawyer, J. E. ;
Al-Kaisi, M. M. .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2006, 98 (05) :1345-1351
[3]  
Blackmer A.M., 1997, NITROGEN FERTILIZER
[4]   SIMPLE STATISTICAL PROCEDURE FOR PARTITIONING SOIL TEST CORRELATION DATA INTO 2 CLASSES [J].
CATE, RB ;
NELSON, LA .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA PROCEEDINGS, 1971, 35 (04) :658-&
[6]  
Dahnke W. C., 1990, Soil testing and plant analysis., P45
[7]   A COMPARISON OF METHODS OF DETERMINING NITROGEN FRACTIONS IN SOILS [J].
FERGUSON, WS ;
SOWDEN, FJ .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1966, 46 (01) :1-&
[8]   TOTAL NITROGEN USING A SODIUM-HYDROXIDE INDEX AND DOUBLE SAMPLING THEORY [J].
GEIST, JM ;
HAZARD, JW .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1975, 39 (02) :340-343
[9]  
HOEFT RG, 2002, ILLINOIS AGRONOMY HD, P102
[10]   CHARACTERIZATION OF MINERALIZABLE NITROGEN IN SOILS [J].
KEENEY, DR ;
BREMNER, JM .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA PROCEEDINGS, 1966, 30 (06) :714-&