Promoting timely goals of care conversations between gynecologic cancer patients at high-risk of death and their providers

被引:12
作者
Davidson, Brittany A. [1 ,2 ]
Puechl, Allison M. [1 ,9 ]
Watson, Catherine H. [1 ,10 ]
Lim, Stephanie [3 ]
Gatta, Luke [3 ]
Monuszko, Karen [4 ]
Drury, Kerry [3 ,11 ]
Ryan, Emma S. [4 ,12 ]
Rice, Shelley [5 ,13 ]
Truong, Tracy [6 ]
Ma, Jessica [7 ]
Power, Steve [8 ]
Jordan, Weston [8 ,14 ]
Kurtovic, Kelli [3 ]
Havrilesky, Laura J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Duke Canc Inst, Div Gynecol Oncol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[2] Duke Canc Inst, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Med Sch, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[5] Duke Univ Hlth Syst, Div Palliat Care, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[6] Duke Univ, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[7] Durham VA Hlth Care Syst, Durham Ctr Innovat Accelerate Discovery & Practic, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[8] Duke Univ Hlth Syst, Off Chief Med Officer, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[9] Levine Canc Inst, Charlotte, NC 28204 USA
[10] Vanderbilty Univ, Nashville, TN USA
[11] Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[12] Indiana Univ, Indianapolis, IN 46204 USA
[13] Peace Hlth St Joseph, Bellingham, WA 98225 USA
[14] PremierInc, Durham, NC USA
关键词
Gynecologic cancer; Goals of care; Quality; LIFE CARE; END; CHEMOTHERAPY; DISCUSSIONS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.12.009
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. We designed a multi-faceted intervention to increase the rate of outpatient goals of care (GOC) conversations in women with gynecologic cancers who are at high-risk of death. Methods and materials. A multidisciplinary team developed an educational program around GOC conversations at end-of-life and chose criteria to prospectively identify patients at high-risk of death who might benefit from timely GOC conversations: recurrent or metastatic endometrial, cervical or vulvar cancer or platinumresistant ovarian cancer. Gynecologic oncology provider consensus was built regarding the need to improve the quality and timing of GOC conversations. Eligible outpatients were prospectively identified and providers alerted pre-encounter; timely GOC documentation within 3 visits of high-risk identification was tracked. Our institution concurrently and subsequently tracked GOC documentation during the last 6 months of life among all established oncology patients. Results. Of 220 pilot period high-risk patients (96 pre- and 124 during pilot period 2017-2018), timely GOC discussion documentation increased from 30.2% to 88.7% (p < 0.001) and this increase was sustained over time. In the post-pilot period (2019-2020), among patients seen by oncologists during last 6 months of life, compared to other cancer types, gynecologic cancer patients had a higher rate of GOC documentation (81% versus 9%; p < 0.001), a lower rate of receiving chemotherapy during the last 14 days of life (2% vs 5%; p = 0.051), and no difference in end-of-life admissions (29% vs 31%; p = NS).
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 294
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Baile W F, 2000, Oncologist, V5, P302, DOI 10.1634/theoncologist.5-4-302
  • [2] Communication About Serious Illness Care Goals A Review and Synthesis of Best Practices
    Bernacki, Rachelle E.
    Block, Susan D.
    [J]. JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 174 (12) : 1994 - 2003
  • [3] The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomised controlled trial
    Detering, Karen M.
    Hancock, Andrew D.
    Reade, Michael C.
    Silvester, William
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2010, 340 : 847
  • [4] Timing of end-of-life care discussion with performance on end-of-life quality indicators in ovarian cancer
    Lopez-Acevedo, Micael
    Havrilesky, Laura J.
    Broadwater, Gloria
    Kamal, Arif H.
    Abernethy, Amy P.
    Berchuck, Andrew
    Secord, Angeles Alvarez
    Tulsky, James A.
    Valea, Fidel
    Lee, Paula S.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 130 (01) : 156 - 161
  • [5] ASCO-ESMO consensus statement on quality cancer care
    Ludwig, Heinz
    Mok, Tony
    Stovall, Ellen
    Ganz, Patricia
    Armitage, James
    Catane, Raphael
    Adamou, Adamos
    Redmond, Kathy
    [J]. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2006, 17 (07) : 1063 - 1064
  • [6] Reasons Why Physicians Do Not Have Discussions About Poor Prognosis, Why It Matters, and What Can Be Improved
    Mack, Jennifer W.
    Smith, Thomas J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (22) : 2715 - 2717
  • [7] Trends in end-of-life care and health care spending in women with uterine cancer
    Margolis, Benjamin
    Chen, Ling
    Accordino, Melissa K.
    Hillyer, Grace Clarke
    Hou, June Y.
    Tergas, Ana I.
    Burke, William M.
    Neugut, Alfred I.
    Ananth, Cande V.
    Hershman, Dawn L.
    Wright, Jason D.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 217 (04) : 434.e1 - 434.e10
  • [8] Medicine, 2001, Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century, DOI [10.17226/10027, DOI 10.17226/10027]
  • [9] The role and timing of palliative medicine consultation for women with gynecologic malignancies: Association with end of life interventions and direct hospital costs
    Nevadunsky, Nicole S.
    Gordon, Sharon
    Spoozak, Lori
    Van Arsdale, Anne
    Hou, Yijuan
    Klobocista, Merieme
    Eti, Serife
    Rapkin, Bruce
    Goldberg, Gary L.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2014, 132 (01) : 3 - 7
  • [10] NQF, PALL CAR END LIF CAR