Continuous sulfidogenic wastewater treatment with iron sulfide sludge oxidation and recycle

被引:12
作者
Deng, Dongyang [1 ]
Lin, Lian-Shin [1 ]
机构
[1] West Virginia Univ, Civil and Environm Engn, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
COD/sulfate; Fe/S; Sulfidogenic; Wastewater treatment; Sludge recycle; COD oxidation rate; PASSIVE CO-TREATMENT; ACID-MINE DRAINAGE; HYDROGEN-SULFIDE; SULFATE; PERFORMANCE; BACTERIA; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.watres.2017.02.048
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study evaluated the technical feasibility of packed-bed sulfidogenic bioreactors dosed with ferrous chloride for continuous wastewater treatment over a 450-day period. In phase I, the bioreactors were operated under different combinations of carbon, iron, and sulfate mass loads without sludge recycling to identify optimal treatment conditions. A COD/sulfate mass ratio of 2 and a Fe/S molar ratio of 1 yielded the best treatment performance with COD oxidation rate of 786 +/- 82 mg/(L center dot d), which resulted in 84 9% COD removal, 94 +/- 6% sulfate reduction, and good iron retention (99 +/- 1%) under favorable pH conditions (6.2-7.0). In phase II, the bioreactors were operated under this chemical load combination over a 62-day period, during which 7 events of sludge collection, oxidation, and recycling were performed. The collected sludge materials contained both inorganic and organic matter with FeS and FeS2 as the main inorganic constituents. In each event, the sludge materials were oxidized in an oxidizing basin before recycling to mix with the wastewater influent. Sludge recycling yielded enhanced COD removal (90 +/- 6% vs. 75 +/- 7%), and better effluent quality in terms of pH (6.8 +/- 0.1 vs. 6.5 +/- 0.2), iron (0.7 +/- 0.5 vs. 1.9 +/- 1.7 mg/L), and sulfide-S (0.3 +/- 0.1 vs. 0.4 +/- 0.1 mg/L) removal compared to the baseline operation without sludge recycling during phase II. This process exhibited treatment stability with reasonable variations, and fairly consistent sludge content over long periods of operation under a range of COD/ sulfate and Fe/S ratios without sludge recycling. The bioreactors were found to absorb recycling-induced changes efficiently without causing elevated suspended solids in the effluents. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:210 / 217
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, PASSIVE SEMIACTIVE T
[2]   Removal of sulfate and heavy metals by sulfate reducing bacteria in short-term bench scale upflow anaerobic packed bed reactor runs [J].
Jong, T ;
Parry, DL .
WATER RESEARCH, 2003, 37 (14) :3379-3389
[3]   Performance and ethanol oxidation kinetics of a sulfate-reducing fluidized-bed reactor treating acidic metal-containing wastewater [J].
Kaksonen, AH ;
Franzmann, PD ;
Puhakka, JA .
BIODEGRADATION, 2003, 14 (03) :207-217
[4]   Characterization of stabilized/solidified refinery oily sludge and incinerated refinery sludge with cement using XRD, SEM and EXAFS [J].
Karamalidis, Athanasios K. ;
Psycharis, Vasileios ;
Nicolis, Ioannis ;
Pavlidou, Eleni ;
Benazeth, Simone ;
Voudrias, Evangelos A. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 43 (10) :1144-1156
[5]   Remediation of acidic waste waters using immobilised, acidophilic sulfate-reducing bacteria [J].
Kolmert, Å ;
Johnson, DB .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2001, 76 (08) :836-843
[6]   Biotechnological treatment of sulfate-rich wastewaters [J].
Lens, PNL ;
Visser, A ;
Janssen, AJH ;
Pol, LWH ;
Lettinga, G .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 28 (01) :41-88
[7]   Field-scale demonstration of the potential for sewage to remediate acidic mine waters [J].
McCullough, C. D. ;
Lund, M. A. ;
May, J. M. .
MINE WATER AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 27 (01) :31-39
[8]  
Metcalf Eddy I, 2013, Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery
[9]  
Oude Elferink S.J.W.H., 1998, SULFATE REDUCING BAC
[10]   ATTACHED VERSUS SUSPENDED GROWTH ANAEROBIC REACTORS - RESPONSE TO TOXIC-SUBSTANCES [J].
PARKIN, GF ;
SPEECE, RE .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1983, 15 (8-9) :261-289