Automatic penalty continuation in structural topology optimization

被引:37
|
作者
Rojas-Labanda, Susana [1 ]
Stolpe, Mathias [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Wind Energy, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
关键词
Topology optimization; Continuation methods; Benchmarking; Mechanism design; Minimum compliance; ALGORITHM; FILTERS; SIMP;
D O I
10.1007/s00158-015-1277-1
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Structural topology optimization problems are often modelled using material interpolation schemes to produce almost solid-and-void designs. The problems become non convex due to the use of these techniques. Several articles introduce continuation approaches in the material penalization parameter to reduce the risks of ending in local minima. However, the numerical performance of continuation methods has not been studied in detail. The first purpose of this article is to benchmark existing continuation methods and the classical formulation with fixed penalty parameter in structural topology optimization. This is done using performance profiles on 225 minimum compliance and 150 compliant mechanism design problems. The results show that continuation methods generally find better designs. On the other hand, they typically require a larger number of iterations. In the second part of the article this issue is addressed. We propose an automatic continuation method, where the material penalization parameter is included as a new variable in the problem and a constraint guarantees that the requested penalty is eventually reached. The numerical results suggest that this approach is an appealing alternative to continuation methods. Automatic continuation also generally obtains better designs than the classical formulation using a reduced number of iterations.
引用
收藏
页码:1205 / 1221
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Topology optimization of frame structures—joint penalty and material selection
    H. Fredricson
    Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2005, 30 : 193 - 200
  • [32] Multiphysics for structural topology optimization
    Liu, Zhenyu
    Korvink, Jan G.
    Reed, Michael L.
    SENSOR LETTERS, 2006, 4 (02) : 191 - 199
  • [33] SIMP-based Evolutionary Structural Optimization Method for Topology Optimization
    Li, Yingdi
    Kuang, Bing
    Liu, Juan
    MATERIAL SCIENCE, CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE SCIENCE, MECHANICAL ENGINEERING AND MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY II, 2014, 651-653 : 2237 - 2240
  • [34] Automatic projection parameter increase for three-field density-based topology optimization
    Dunning, Peter
    Wein, Fabian
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2025, 68 (02)
  • [35] Accelerated topology optimization by means of deep learning
    Kallioras, Nikos Ath
    Kazakis, Georgios
    Lagaros, Nikos D.
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2020, 62 (03) : 1185 - 1212
  • [36] Advancing building engineering through structural and topology optimization
    Zegard, Tomas
    Hartz, Christian
    Mazurek, Arek
    Baker, William F.
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2020, 62 (02) : 915 - 935
  • [37] Structural topology optimization considering geometrical and load nonlinearities
    Wang, Bin
    Bai, Jiantao
    Lu, Shanbin
    Zuo, Wenjie
    COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2023, 289
  • [38] Connecting architecture and engineering through structural topology optimization
    Beghini, Lauren L.
    Beghini, Alessandro
    Katz, Neil
    Baker, William F.
    Paulin, Glaucio H.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2014, 59 : 716 - 726
  • [39] Honeycomb Wachspress finite elements for structural topology optimization
    Talischi, Cameron
    Paulino, Glaucio H.
    Le, Chau H.
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2009, 37 (06) : 569 - 583
  • [40] On some fundamental properties of structural topology optimization problems
    Stolpe, Mathias
    STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2010, 41 (05) : 661 - 670