Cost-effectiveness of real-world administration of tobacco pharmacotherapy in the United States Veterans Health Administration

被引:9
作者
Barnett, Paul G. [1 ]
Ignacio, Rosalinda, V [2 ,3 ]
Kim, Hyungjin Myra [2 ,4 ]
Geraci, Mark C. [5 ]
Essenmacher, Carol A. [6 ]
Hall, Stephanie, V [2 ,7 ]
Sherman, Scott E. [8 ,9 ]
Duffy, Sonia A. [2 ,3 ,10 ]
机构
[1] VA Palo Alto Healthcare Syst, Hlth Econ Resource Ctr, Menlo Pk, CA USA
[2] VA Ctr Clin Management & Res, Dept Vet Affairs Healthcare Syst, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Psychiat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Ctr Stat Consultat & Res, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Dept Vet Affairs, Pharm Benefits Management Serv, Hines, IL USA
[6] Dept Vet Affairs Healthcare Syst, Battle Creek, MI USA
[7] Univ Michigan, Dept Learning Hlth Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[8] VA New York Harbor Healthcare Syst, New York, NY USA
[9] NYU, Sch Med, Dept Populat Hlth, New York, NY USA
[10] Ohio State Univ, Coll Nursing, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
关键词
Adjusted analysis; cost-effectiveness; propensity; tobacco cessation; tobacco pharmacotherapy; veterans; NICOTINE REPLACEMENT THERAPY; SMOKING-CESSATION; SUICIDE; ABSTINENCE; COHORT; CARE; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/add.14621
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aims Cost-effectiveness studies in randomized clinical trials have shown that tobacco cessation pharmacotherapy is among the most cost-effective of health-care interventions. Clinical trial eligibility criteria and treatment protocols may not be followed in actual practice. This study aimed to determine whether tobacco cessation pharmacotherapy is cost-effective in real-world settings. Design A retrospective analysis of costs and outcomes. Setting Hospitals and clinics of the US Veterans Health Administration, USA. Participants A total of 589 862 US veterans who screened positive for tobacco use in 2011. Intervention and comparator Tobacco users who initiated smoking cessation pharmacotherapy in the 6 months after screening were compared with those who did not use pharmacotherapy in this period. Pharmacotherapy included nicotine replacement therapy, bupropion (if prescribed at 300 mg per day or specifically for tobacco cessation) or varenicline. Measures Effectiveness was determined from responses to a subsequent tobacco screening conducted between 7 and 18 months after the treatment observation period. Cost of medications and prescribing health-care encounters was determined for the period between initial and follow-up tobacco use screening. Multivariate fixed-effects regression was used to assess the effect of initial treatment status on cost and outcome while controlling for differences in case-mix with propensity weighting to adjust for confounding by indication. Findings Thirteen per cent of participants received tobacco cessation pharmacotherapy within 6 months of initial screening. After an average of an additional 218.1 days' follow-up, those who initially received pharmacotherapy incurred $143.79 in additional treatment cost and had a 3.1% absolute increase in tobacco quit rates compared with those who were not initially treated. This represents an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $4705 per quit. The upper limit of the 99.9% confidence region was $5600 per quit. Without propensity adjustment, the cost-effectiveness ratio was $7144 per quit, with the upper limit of the 99.9% confidence region $9500/quit. Conclusions Tobacco cessation pharmacotherapy provided by the US Veterans Health Administration in 2011/12 was cost-effective in this real-world setting, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $4705 per quit.
引用
收藏
页码:1436 / 1445
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Nicotine replacement therapy use among a cohort of smokers [J].
Alberg, AJ ;
Patnaik, JL ;
May, JW ;
Hoffman, SC ;
Gitchell, J ;
Comstock, GW ;
Helzlsouer, KJ .
JOURNAL OF ADDICTIVE DISEASES, 2005, 24 (01) :101-113
[2]   A prospective cohort study challenging the effectiveness of population-based medical intervention for smoking cessation [J].
Alpert, Hillel R. ;
Connolly, Gregory N. ;
Biener, Lois .
TOBACCO CONTROL, 2013, 22 (01) :32-37
[3]   The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (16) :3078-3094
[4]   Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies [J].
Austin, Peter C. ;
Stuart, Elizabeth A. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 34 (28) :3661-3679
[5]   A Tutorial and Case Study in Propensity Score Analysis: An Application to Estimating the Effect of In-Hospital Smoking Cessation Counseling on Mortality [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2011, 46 (01) :119-151
[6]   Changes in Veteran Tobacco Use Identified in Electronic Medical Records [J].
Barnett, Paul G. ;
Chow, Adam ;
Flores, Nicole E. ;
Sherman, Scott E. ;
Duffy, Sonia A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2017, 53 (01) :E9-E18
[7]   Association between smoking cessation and short-term health-care use: results from an international prospective cohort study (ATTEMPT) [J].
Beard, Emma ;
Shahab, Lion ;
Curry, Susan J. ;
West, Robert .
ADDICTION, 2013, 108 (11) :1979-1988
[8]   Misclassification of suicide deaths: examining the psychiatric history of overdose decedents [J].
Bohnert, Amy S. B. ;
McCarthy, John F. ;
Ignacio, Rosalinda V. ;
Ilgen, Mark A. ;
Eisenberg, Anna ;
Blow, Frederic C. .
INJURY PREVENTION, 2013, 19 (05) :326-330
[9]   Systematic Biases in Cross-sectional Community Studies may Underestimate the Effectiveness of Stop-Smoking Medications [J].
Borland, Ron ;
Partos, Timea R. ;
Cummings, Michael .
NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2012, 14 (12) :1483-1487
[10]  
Cahill K, 2013, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI [10.1002/14651858.CD009329.pub2, 10.1002/14651858.CD006103.pub6]