Culture pH and osmolality influence proliferation and embryoid body yields of murine embryonic stem cells

被引:35
作者
Chaudhry, Muhammad A. [1 ,2 ]
Bowen, Bruce D. [2 ]
Piret, James M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Michael Smith Labs, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[2] Univ British Columbia, Dept Chem & Biol Chem, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
关键词
Embryonic stem cells; Cell therapies; pH; Osmolality; Kinetics; Cell culture engineering; SUSPENSION-CULTURE; MOUSE EMBRYOS; DIFFERENTIATION; EXPANSION; GROWTH; METABOLISM; HYBRIDOMA; PROTEIN; OXYGEN; LAYERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.bej.2009.03.005
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The realization of many stem cell based regenerative therapies will depend on Culture production. Murine embryonic stern cells (mESC) provide a practical model for stem cell process research as they can be readily obtained at relatively high numbers and purities. However, an understanding of their environmental tolerance ranges is still lacking. These tolerance ranges were explored using an embryoid body (EB) formation assay as a functional measure of mESC maintenance. The mESC were exposed to wide ranges of initial medium glucose, glutamine, ammonium, lactate, pH and osiliolality conditions. Within the common ranges of conventional maintenance cultures, the only environmental variables that significantly influenced EB yields were pH and osmolality. Dose-response experiments with these two variables revealed that, within 48 h, the EB yield was, for example, similar to 3-fold decreased (p < 0.05) when mESC were Cultured either at an initial pH of 7.0 or an osmolality of 400 mOsm/kg compared to a medium at pH 7.3 and 300mOsm/kg. This decline was due to decreases in both the growth rate and in the fraction of EB-forming cells. More extreme pH (6.7 or 7.75) as well as osmolality (200 or 500 mOsm/kg) conditions reduced the EB formation potential to even lower levels. The decreased growth rates and EB forming potential of mESC cultured at pH 6.7 or 7.75 for 24 or 48 h. when returned to pH 7.3 medium, recovered to control levels within 96-144 h. These studies provide guidance in developing optimal environmental tolerance ranges within which both the mESC output from maintenance cultures as well as the subsequent EB yields can be maximized. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 135
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[2]   Expansion of undifferentiated murine embryonic stem cells as aggregates in suspension culture bioreactors [J].
Cormier, Jaymi T. ;
Zur Nieden, Nicole I. ;
Rancourt, Derrick E. ;
Kallos, Michael S. .
TISSUE ENGINEERING, 2006, 12 (11) :3233-3245
[3]   NEW ASPECTS OF CARBOHYDRATE-METABOLISM IN TUMOR-CELLS [J].
EIGENBRODT, E .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1985, 23 (09) :863-863
[4]   ESTABLISHMENT IN CULTURE OF PLURIPOTENTIAL CELLS FROM MOUSE EMBRYOS [J].
EVANS, MJ ;
KAUFMAN, MH .
NATURE, 1981, 292 (5819) :154-156
[5]   Shear-controlled single-step mouse embryonic stem cell expansion and embryoid body-based differentiation [J].
Fok, EYL ;
Zandstra, PW .
STEM CELLS, 2005, 23 (09) :1333-1342
[6]   THE REGULATION OF THE INTRACELLULAR PH IN CELLS FROM VERTEBRATES [J].
FRELIN, C ;
VIGNE, P ;
LADOUX, A ;
LAZDUNSKI, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY, 1988, 174 (01) :3-14
[7]   Differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into embryoid bodies comprising the three embryonic germ layers [J].
Itskovitz-Eldor, J ;
Schuldiner, M ;
Karsenti, D ;
Eden, A ;
Yanuka, O ;
Amit, M ;
Soreq, H ;
Benvenisty, N .
MOLECULAR MEDICINE, 2000, 6 (02) :88-95
[8]   IN-VITRO DIFFERENTIATION OF EMBRYONIC STEM-CELLS [J].
KELLER, GM .
CURRENT OPINION IN CELL BIOLOGY, 1995, 7 (06) :862-869
[9]   Effective isolation and culture of endothelial cells in embryoid body differentiated from human embryonic stem cells [J].
Kim, Jumi ;
Moon, Sung-Hwan ;
Lee, Soo-Hong ;
Lee, Dong-Ryul ;
Koh, Gou-Young ;
Chung, Hyung-Min .
STEM CELLS AND DEVELOPMENT, 2007, 16 (02) :269-280
[10]   Bioreactor development for stem cell expansion and controlled differentiation [J].
King, James A. ;
Miller, William M. .
CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL BIOLOGY, 2007, 11 (04) :394-398