Resilience Assessment Based on Time-Dependent System Reliability Analysis

被引:42
作者
Hu, Zhen [1 ]
Mahadevan, Sankaran [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, 279 Jacobs Hall, Nashville, TN 37235 USA
关键词
resilience; uncertainty; time-dependent reliability; mechanical system; FRAMEWORK; ECOLOGY;
D O I
10.1115/1.4034109
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Significant efforts have been recently devoted to the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of resilience in engineering systems. Current resilience evaluation methods, however, have mainly focused on business supply chains and civil infrastructure, and need to be extended for application in engineering design. A new resilience metric is proposed in this paper for the design of mechanical systems to bridge this gap, by investigating the effects of recovery activity and system failure paths on system resilience. The defined resilience metric is connected to design through time-dependent system reliability analysis. This connection enables us to design a system for a specific resilience target in the design stage. Since computationally expensive computer simulations are usually used in design, a surrogate modeling method is developed to efficiently perform time-dependent system reliability analysis. Based on the time-dependent system reliability analysis, dominant system failure paths are enumerated and then the system resilience is estimated. The connection between the proposed resilience assessment method and design is explored through sensitivity analysis and component importance measure (CIM). Two numerical examples are used to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed resilience assessment method.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
ASME-ITI, 2009, ALL HAZ RISK RES PRI
[2]   Systems Resilience for Multihazard Environments: Definition, Metrics, and Valuation for Decision Making [J].
Ayyub, Bilal M. .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2014, 34 (02) :340-355
[3]   Resilience-based network component importance measures [J].
Barker, Kash ;
Ramirez-Marquez, Jose Emmanuel ;
Rocco, Claudio M. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2013, 117 :89-97
[4]   Importance measures for inland waterway network resilience [J].
Baroud, Hiba ;
Barker, Kash ;
Ramirez-Marquez, Jose E. ;
Rocco S, Claudio M. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2014, 62 :55-67
[5]   Efficient surrogate models for reliability analysis of systems with multiple failure modes [J].
Bichon, Barron J. ;
McFarland, John M. ;
Mahadevan, Sankaran .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2011, 96 (10) :1386-1395
[6]   A framework to quantitatively assess and enhance the seismic resilience of communities [J].
Bruneau, M ;
Chang, SE ;
Eguchi, RT ;
Lee, GC ;
O'Rourke, TD ;
Reinhorn, AM ;
Shinozuka, M ;
Tierney, K ;
Wallace, WA ;
von Winterfeldt, D .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2003, 19 (04) :733-752
[7]   Spatial resilience: integrating landscape ecology, resilience, and sustainability [J].
Cumming, Graeme S. .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2011, 26 (07) :899-909
[8]   AK-SYS: An adaptation of the AK-MCS method for system reliability [J].
Fauriat, W. ;
Gayton, N. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2014, 123 :137-144
[9]  
Hosseini S., DETC201434558 ASME
[10]   A review of definitions and measures of system resilience [J].
Hosseini, Seyedmohsen ;
Barker, Kash ;
Ramirez-Marquez, Jose E. .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2016, 145 :47-61