The current status of FDG-PET in tumour volume definition in radiotherapy treatment planning

被引:118
|
作者
van Baardwijk, Angela
Baumert, Brigitta G.
Bosmans, Geert
van Kroonenburgh, Marinus
Stroobants, Sigrid
Gregoire, Vincent
Lambin, Philippe
De Ruysscher, Dirk
机构
[1] Univ Maastricht, MAASTRO, GROW Res Inst, NL-6229 ET Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Hosp Maastricht, MAASTRO Clin, Dept Radiotherapy, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Hosp Maastricht, Dept Nucl Med, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Hosp Gasthuisberg, Dept Nucl Med, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[5] Catholic Univ Louvain, St Luc Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
[6] Catholic Univ Louvain, St Luc Univ Hosp, Ctr Mol Imaging & Expt Radiotherapy, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
target volume delineation; positron emission; tomography; radiotherapy; radiation; treatment; planning; primary tumour; regional lymph nodes;
D O I
10.1016/j.ctrv.2006.02.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Positron emission tomography (PET) scan, mainly using 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) as a tracer, is currently widely accepted as a diagnostic tool. in oncology. It may lead to a change in staging and therefore in treatment management. PET can also be used to define the target volume in radiation treatment planning and to evaluate treatment response. In this review, we focused on issues concerning the rote of PET in target volume delineation, both for the primary tumour and regional lymph nodes. A literature search was performed using MEDLINE. Furthermore, the following questions were addressed: does PET allow accurate tumour delineation and does it improve the outcome of radiotherapy, in terms of reduced toxicity or a higher tumour control probability? Combined computer tomography (CT) and PET information seems to influence target volume delineation. Using (CT-) PET scan, interobserver variability is being reduced. Only few studies compared delineation based on PET with pathologic examination, showing a complex relation. Preliminary results concerning incorporation of PET information in to target volume delineation varies in different tumour sites. In the field of lung cancer, incorporation of PET seems to improve tumour coverage and spare normal tissues, which may lead to less toxicity or the possibility to escalate dose. In oesophageal cancer and in lymphoma, PET scan can be used to include PET positive lymph nodes in the target volume. In most other tumour sites not enough data are currently available to draw definitive conclusions about the role of PET in radiation treatment planning. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 260
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Current status of FDG-PET/CT in the treatment setting of Hodgkin’s lymphoma in childhood and adolescence
    Kluge R.
    Kurch L.
    Georgi T.
    Körholz D.
    Clinical and Translational Imaging, 2015, 3 (4) : 309 - 319
  • [42] FDG PET/CT for radiotherapy treatment planning. Comparison of functional volume delineation algorithms
    Withofs, Nadia
    Bernard, Claire
    van der Rest, Catherine
    Martinive, Philippe
    Hatt, Mathieu
    Visvikis, Dimitris
    Coucke, Philippe
    Hustinx, Roland
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2011, 52
  • [43] Role of FDG-PET and PET/CT in treatment planning of other haematological tumours
    Specht, L.
    EJC SUPPLEMENTS, 2009, 7 (02): : 25 - 26
  • [44] FDG-PET: procedure guidelines for tumour imaging
    Emilio Bombardieri
    Cumali Aktolun
    Richard P. Baum
    Angelika Bishof-Delaloye
    John Buscombe
    Jean François Chatal
    Lorenzo Maffioli
    Roy Moncayo
    Luc Mortelmans
    Sven N. Reske
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2003, 30 : B115 - B124
  • [45] COMPARISON BETWEEN CT-TARGET VOLUME DELINEATION AND DIFFERENT METHODS OF FDG-PET TARGET VOLUME DELINEATION FOR RADIOTHERAPY PLANNING OF NSCLC
    Rodari, M.
    Navarria, P.
    Lattuada, P.
    Scorsetti, M.
    Chiti, A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 94 : S18 - S19
  • [46] Imaging infection and inflammation with FDG-PET, current status and future prospects
    Oyen, WJG
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2004, 31 : S242 - S242
  • [47] Oesophageal tumour progression between the diagnostic 18F-FDG-PET and the 18F-FDG-PET for radiotherapy treatment planning
    Muijs, Christina T.
    Pruim, Jan
    Beukema, Jannet C.
    Berveling, Maaike J.
    Plukker, John Th.
    Langendijk, Johannes A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2013, 106 (03) : 283 - 287
  • [48] FDG-PET/CT in the management of lymphomas: current status and future directions
    El-Galaly, T. C.
    Villa, D.
    Gormsen, L. C.
    Baech, J.
    Lo, A.
    Cheah, C. Y.
    JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 284 (04) : 358 - 376
  • [49] Variation in gross tumor volume delineation using CT, MRI, and FDG-PET in planning radiotherapy of anal cancer.
    Serup-Hansen, Eva
    Hendel, Helle Westergren
    Johannesen, Helle Hjorth
    Ottosson, Wiviann
    Hollensen, Christian
    Persson, Gitte Fredberg
    Geertsen, Poul F.
    Havsteen, Hanne
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (04)
  • [50] Influence of FDG-PET on primary nodal target volume definition for head and neck carcinomas
    Terhaard, C.
    Van Egmond, S. L.
    Piscaer, V.
    Janssen, L. M.
    Hobbelink, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 : S26 - S26