Classification of hyperspectral imagery for identifying fecal and ingesta contaminants

被引:11
作者
Park, B [1 ]
Windham, WR [1 ]
Lawrence, KC [1 ]
Smith, DP [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA, ARS, Richard B Russell Res Ctr, Athens, GA 30604 USA
来源
MONITORING FOOD SAFETY, AGRICULTURE, AND PLANT HEALTH | 2004年 / 5271卷
关键词
hyperspectral; imaging spectroscopy; image classification; food safety inspection; fecal contamination; poultry; classification methods;
D O I
10.1117/12.514724
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
This paper presents the research results of the performance of classification methods for hyperspectral poultry imagery to identify fecal and ingesta contaminants on the surface of broiler carcasses. A pushbroom line-scan hyperspectral imager was used to acquire hyperspectral data with 512 narrow bands covered from 400 to 900 nm wavelengths. Three different feces from digestive tracts (duodenum, ceca, colon), and ingesta were used as contaminants. These contaminants were collected from the broiler carcasses fed by corn, milo, and wheat with soybean meals. For the selection of optimum classifier, various widely used supervised classification methods (parallelepiped, minimum distance, Mahalanobis distance, maximum likelihood, spectral angle mapper, and binary coding) were investigated. The classification accuracies ranged from 62.94% to 92.27%. The highest classification accuracy for identifying contaminants for corn fed carcasses was 92.27% with spectral angle mapper classifier. While, the classification accuracy was 82.02% with maximum likelihood method for milo fed carcasses and 91.16% accuracy was obtained for wheat fed carcasses when same classification method was used. The mean classification accuracy obtained in this study for classifying fecal and ingesta contaminants was 90.21%.
引用
收藏
页码:118 / 127
页数:10
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, REMOTE SENSING DIGIT
[2]   Consequences of scattering for spectral imaging of turbid biologic tissue [J].
Arnoldussen, ME ;
Cohen, D ;
Bearman, GH ;
Grundfest, WS .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2000, 5 (03) :300-306
[3]  
Bostater CR, 1998, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS, V3499, P277, DOI 10.1117/12.332760
[4]   Hybrid pattern recognition method using evolutionary computing techniques applied to the exploitation of hyperspectral imagery and medical spectral data [J].
Burman, JA .
IMAGE AND SIGNAL PROCESSING FOR REMOTE SENSING V, 1999, 3871 :348-357
[5]   Hyperspectral imaging for detection of scab in wheat [J].
Delwiche, SR ;
Kim, MS .
BIOLOGICAL QUALITY AND PRECISION AGRICULTURE II, 2000, 4203 :13-20
[6]   Hyperspectral imaging for dermal hemoglobin spectroscopy [J].
Dwyer, PJ ;
DiMarzio, CA .
SUBSURFACE SENSORS AND APPLICATIONS, 1999, 3752 :72-82
[7]   Hyperspectral image sensor for weed selective spraying [J].
Feyaerts, F ;
Pollet, P ;
Van Gool, L ;
Wambacq, P .
ADVANCED PHOTONIC SENSORS AND APPLICATIONS, 1999, 3897 :193-203
[8]  
*FSI, 1997, FOOD SAF IN REP PRES
[9]   A review of hyperspectral imagers and comparison with respect to real time processing on space and aircraft platforms. [J].
Hart, CL ;
Slough, WJ .
HYBRID IMAGE AND SIGNAL PROCESSING VI, 1998, 3389 :139-149
[10]   Characteristics and capabilities of the Hyperspectral Imaging Microscope [J].
Huebschman, ML ;
Schultz, RA ;
Garner, HR .
IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY MAGAZINE, 2002, 21 (04) :104-117