Effects of thermal mass and flow rate on forced-circulation solar hot-water system: Comparison of water-in-glass and U-pipe evacuated-tube solar collectors

被引:63
作者
Gao, Yan [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Qunli [2 ]
Fan, Rui [3 ]
Lin, Xinxing [1 ]
Yu, Yong [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Civil Engn & Architecture, Beijing Key Lab Green Bldg & Energy Efficient Tec, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Univ Civil Engn & Architecture, Being Key Lab Heating Gas Supply Ventilating & Ai, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[3] Tongji Univ, Sino German Coll Appl Sci, Shanghai 201804, Peoples R China
关键词
Fluid thermal mass; Flow rate; Water-in-glass evacuated-tube solar collector; U-pipe evacuated-tube solar collector; VACUUM TUBES; PERFORMANCE; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.solener.2013.10.014
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The energy performance of a water-in-glass evacuated-tube solar collector (WGETsc) and U-pipe evacuated-tube solar collector (UpETsc) is compared. The necessity and effectiveness of modeling WGETsc including thermal mass is validated by experimentation. A comparison of the thermal performance of systems installed with WGETsc and UpETsc having the same efficiency curve was made. The average thermal efficiency of WGETsc is less than that of UpETsc; WGETsc storage energy 25-35% is less than that of UpETsc because of fluid thermal mass influence for flow rates 10-70 kg/h m(2). If fluid thermal mass is neglected then the useful energy output will be overpredicted in numerical simulations. Moreover, the flow rate may also affect system thermal performance. The UpETsc has small optimization flow rate range of 20-40 kg/h m(2) compared with 20-60 kg/h m(2) for WGETsc. Finally, the optimal flow rate for maximum useful energy is determined by meteorological conditions such as solar radiation and outdoor temperature, the pump control strategy and even the thermal performance of the collector. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 301
页数:12
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, 9806 ISO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, 1297522006 EN
[3]   Single and two-phase flow modeling and analysis of a coaxial vacuum tube solar collector [J].
Badar, Abdul Waheed ;
Buchholz, Reiner ;
Ziegler, Felix .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2012, 86 (01) :175-189
[5]   Optimal control of flow in solar collectors for maximum exergy extraction [J].
Badescu, Viorel .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2007, 50 (21-22) :4311-4322
[6]   Natural circulation flow through water-in-glass evacuated tube solar collectors [J].
Budihardjo, Indra ;
Morrison, Graham L. ;
Behnia, Masud .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2007, 81 (12) :1460-1472
[7]   A three-dimensional performance analysis of all-glass vacuum tubes with coaxial fluid conduit [J].
Han, Hyunjoo ;
Kim, Jeong Tai ;
Ahn, Hyun Tae ;
Lee, Sang Jin .
INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS IN HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2008, 35 (05) :589-596
[8]   Optimal design of a forced circulation solar water heating system for a residential unit in cold climate using TRNSYS [J].
Hobbi, Alireza ;
Siddiqui, Kamran .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2009, 83 (05) :700-714
[9]   The performance simulation of all-glass vacuum tubes with coaxial fluid conduit [J].
Kim, Jeong Tai ;
Ahn, Hyun Tae ;
Han, Hyunjoo ;
Kim, Hyung Taek ;
Chun, Wongee .
INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS IN HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2007, 34 (05) :587-597
[10]   Thermal performances comparisons of the glass evacuated tube solar collectors with shapes of absorber tube [J].
Kim, Yong ;
Seo, Taebeom .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2007, 32 (05) :772-795