Surface roughness and morphology of resin composites polished with two-step polishing systems

被引：36

作者：

Can Say, Esra ^{[1
]}

Yurdaguven, Haktan ^{[1
]}

Yaman, Batu Can ^{[2
]}

Ozer, Fusun ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Yeditepe Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Restorat Dent, TR-34728 Istanbul, Turkey

[2] Osmangazi Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Operat Dent, TR-26480 Eskisehir, Turkey

[3] Univ Penn, Sch Dent Med, Dept Prevent & Restorat Sci, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA

来源：

DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL | 2014年 / 33卷 / 03期

关键词：

Surface roughness; Polishing system; Atomic force microscopy; BACTERIAL PLAQUE RETENTION; ORAL HARD MATERIALS; RESTORATIVE MATERIALS; SCANNING-ELECTRON; ONE-STEP; NANOFILLER; MICROSCOPY; TEXTURE; GLOSS; WEAR;

D O I：

10.4012/dmj.2013-287

中图分类号：

R78 [口腔科学];

学科分类号：

1003 ;

摘要：

The purpose of this study was to investigate surface roughness (Ra) and morphology of supra-nanofilled [Estelite Omega (EO), Estelite Sigma Quick (EQ)], micro-hybrid [Esthet.X HD (EHD), G-aenial (GAE)] and nano-hybrid [Clearfil Majesty Posterior (CMP), Charisma Diamond (CD), Beautifil II (BII)] composites polished with two-step polishing systems [Enhance/PoGo (EP); Venus Supra (VS)]. Composite discs, 30 of each type, were prepared. Each composite group was divided into three subgroups: Mylar (control), EP and VS. Ra was evaluated with profilometer. In each composite group, the control had the lowest Ra. With both polishing systems, EO and EQ had significantly the lowest Ra, whereas CMP and BII had the highest. Except for GAE, CD and BIT, the differences in Ra between EP and VS in each composite group were significant, showing smoother surfaces for EP. Supra-nanofilled composites created smoother surfaces than nano-hybrids, and their performance was similar or slightly better than that of micro-hybrids.

引用

页码：332 / 342

页数：11

共 39 条

[1] Comparison of different finishing/polishing systems on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites [J].

Antonson, Sibel A. ;

Yazici, A. Ruya ;

Kilinc, Evren ;

Antonson, Donald E. ;

Hardigan, Patrick C. .

JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2011, 39 :E9-E17

[2] Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures [J].

Baseren, M .

JOURNAL OF BIOMATERIALS APPLICATIONS, 2004, 19 (02) :121-134

[3] Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: A review of the literature [J].

Bollen, CML ;

Lambrechts, P ;

Quirynen, M .

DENTAL MATERIALS, 1997, 13 (04) :258-269

[4] Effect of dental finishing instruments on the surface roughness of composite resins as elucidated by atomic force microscopy [J].

Botta, Ana Carolina ;

Duarte, Sillas, Jr. ;

Paulin Filho, Pedro Iris ;

Gheno, Simoni Maria .

MICROSCOPY AND MICROANALYSIS, 2008, 14 (05) :380-386

[5]

Brambilla E, 2005, AM J DENT, V18, P173

[6] Update on Dental Nanocomposites [J].

Chen, M. -H. .

JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2010, 89 (06) :549-560

[7] EFFECTS OF FINISHING AND POLISHING PROCEDURES ON THE SURFACE TEXTURE OF RESIN COMPOSITES [J].

CHUNG, KH .

DENTAL MATERIALS, 1994, 10 (5-6) :325-330

[8] Surface texture and roughness of polished nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites [J].

Endo, Tatsuo ;

Finger, Werner J. ;

Kanehira, Masafumi ;

Utterodt, Andreas ;

Komatsu, Masashi .

DENTAL MATERIALS JOURNAL, 2010, 29 (02) :213-223

[9] Effects of polishing systems on the surface roughness of tooth-colored materials [J].

Erdemir, Ugur ;

Yildiz, Esra ;

Eren, Meltem Mert ;

Ozsoy, Alev ;

Topcu, Fulya Toksoy .

JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2013, 8 (02) :160-169

[10]

Ereifej N S, 2013, Oper Dent, V38, pE1, DOI 10.2341/12-122-L

← 1 2 3 4 →